--- On Mon, 14/2/11, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] load share eBGP and iBGP
To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Received: Monday, 14 February, 2011, 6:35 PM
We have a PE
What is the best way to do this? GRE tunnel? Will DHCP go across it?
You need something that works on Layer2, GRE is a Layer3 thing. You
could try L2TPv3 Local Switching:
Hi,
we have a ME6524-GT series in a remote location that keeps dying on us
every couple of weeks. Symptoms are:
* All routing protocols and LLDP time out on our side
* Physically the box looks fine, Status LED and even the link LEDs are
still green
- I cannot really say something about the
we've got similar boxes at a few large remote sites doing similar
functionality as yours, and these run pretty rock solid with the
exception of running into a few IOS bugs here there:
sh inv
NAME: ME-C6524GS-8S, DESCR: Cisco Systems Catalyst 6500 1.5 RU
virtual Chassis System
PID:
We're thinking about introducing dedicated Route Reflectors in our
small-ish MPLS VPN network. We currently have ~35 PE devices, all
6500/Sup720. There are no dedicated P devices.
A couple of the PEs are RRs currently, but given the slow RP on a Sup720
we'd like dedicated RRs instead; and there
From: Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk
The ISR 2901 seems fit for the job. Any comments on that? Are there
other devices better suited, assuming we intend to buy something brand
new?
According to FN the ISR 2901 IP Base image doesn't support MPLS, but
otherwise
IS-IS:
Anytime you might want to consider IPv6, and IS-IS dual-stack might be a
challenge
Check for OSPFv3 support
Jon H Bøvre
On 15.03.2011 16:07, Peter Rathlev wrote:
We're thinking about introducing dedicated Route Reflectors in our
small-ish MPLS VPN network. We currently have ~35 PE
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:28:06PM +0100, Jon Harald Bøvre wrote:
IS-IS:
Anytime you might want to consider IPv6, and IS-IS dual-stack might be a
challenge
Check for OSPFv3 support
...which is relevant for a pure *route reflector* exactly why?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the
Bernhard, did the SXI4 code rev fix the issue? I'm getting ready to deploy
SXI5 so I have a vested intrest :-)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:20 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe
Simon Leinen writes:
For l3 traffic only. Still can't export l2 ipv6 netflow data, even
though the records can be viewed on the PFC. :-(
I hadn't known about that particular restrictions, but there are others:
* The AS number fields aren't filled in in IPv6 flows. I understand
that this
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
I looked into this a while back; the 29xx with DATA license seemed ideal,
but it's a shame they're single PSU.
For RR (BGP, IS-IS) IP Base is just fine. You don't need DATA license.
Robert
On 03/15/2011 04:40 PM, Robert Hass wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
I looked into this a while back; the 29xx with DATA license seemed ideal,
but it's a shame they're single PSU.
For RR (BGP, IS-IS) IP Base is just fine. You don't need DATA
Pqa
Q
P
Q
Not bad for ATT ;P
--
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
Vigesimal, and J others...?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
As far as I know they wouldn't need to support anything not in IP Base.
It does seem to support MP-BGP, which is a requirement for an MPLS VPN
RR, and IS-IS.
AFAIK As long as you don't need LDP or MPLS TE then IP Base is
15 matches
Mail list logo
