Try to look at this:
http://depositfiles.com/ru/files/j2b46xu52
or google BRKARC-3465, page 33/34.
D B wrote:
I'm looking for in-depth documentation on switch fabric oversubscription for
these two 10G line cards:
WS-X6708-10GE
WS-X6716-10GE
I'd like to understand its design and operation
On 03/22/2011 01:03 AM, Tony Varriale wrote:
The Nexus 7K is working on the routing side of things but lacks
features (MPLS).
I suspect that's coming very shortly. Which MPLS features are important
to you?
I've heard very shortly from Cisco before. Frankly, they've got no
belief credits
On 03/22/2011 12:50 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 21/03/2011 22:22, Phil Mayers wrote:
Having said that, the truly tragic thing about the 6500 is that, until
recently, it still beat a lot of newer platforms on feature mix combined
with decent performance and reasonable (if not great) density.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:57:59AM +, Phil Mayers wrote:
Especially so if you insist on letting bits of your company compete
against each other with subtly different platforms ;o)
I had a long reply here, but basically: Cisco made their choice. They
chose to go clean slate and
I hadn't seen this linked anywhere in the thread - but this is probably what
you were look for.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/prod_white_paper0900aecd80673385.html
Cheers
Andrew
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Colleagues hi
I'm running LNS (Cisco-based) in my network. At the moment, there is
only class of home subscribers - those ones, who use L2TP tunnel
immeidately between their CPE and my LNS (avoiding LAC). Configuration
on LNS is the following:
vpdn enable
!
vpdn-group L2TP
accept-dialin
Hitesh Vinzoda vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com writes:
Now the scenario is that how to achieve redundancy in LNS environment, I
have heard that HSRP doesnt work in this case.
Send two or more tagged tunnel configurations in your LAC authentication
reply.
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone here using Cisco wireless stuff?
When logging in to the WCS web page as a Lobby ambassador account the system
does not show the lobby-ambassador page, but throws a lot of java excptions to
the user.
It does not make any difference if the
On 22/03/11 14:07, Vladimir Litovka wrote:
Colleagues hi
I'm running LNS (Cisco-based) in my network. At the moment, there is
only class of home subscribers - those ones, who use L2TP tunnel
immeidately between their CPE and my LNS (avoiding LAC). Configuration
on LNS is the following:
I had forgotten about that break out session but it does correspond with what I
thought.
The over-subscription per four port group is 10G on the 6716 as opposed to 16G
on the 6708.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
I was under the impression that the total bandwidth available per
four-port group was 40G, so the limiting factor on the 6708 was
backplane connectivity (2x20G), but perhaps that has more to do with
multicast replication capacity. What is this 16G limit you're
referring to?
John
On Tue, Mar 22,
Hi,
Upgrading from 6.0.196.0 top 7.0.164.3 (both on redhat linux) makes no
difference, and removing 7.0.164.3 and installing it again also didn't solve
the problem.
How to resurrect the Lobby-ambassadors?
sounds like thour lobby config is b0rked. log into the system as a main admin
user
i'm at least moderately certain that you can't do rfc3546-style extensions
in an https probe, at least on a2(3.1) or a4(1). as for http:
probe https PROBE-HTTPS-ASPX
port 80
interval 10
faildetect 2
passdetect interval 10
passdetect count 6
receive 2
request method get url
I've heard very shortly from Cisco before. Frankly, they've got no
belief credits with me. Unless and until I see it, it's vapour.
We all have. If you are considering the platform and need those
features, get a hold of your partner and/or Cisco account team.
Unfortunately I can't share
The connection of the port pairs on the 6708 is limited to 16GB each direction
to the fabric asic.
On the 6716 the groups are four ports which share a connection of 10GB each
direction to the fabric asic.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:jneiber...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Dears,
lately I have some delay to reach my web server (x.x.x.x) hosted by a
hosting company, based on the trace route and the ping delay ~500ms
instead of 15ms, you can see that the delay happen between the
routes/hubs. check out http://pastebin.com/MSSceX6Q
Daily update procedure to upload
On 22/03/2011 20:32, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
lately I have some delay to reach my web server (x.x.x.x) hosted by a
hosting company, based on the trace route and the ping delay ~500ms
instead of 15ms, you can see that the delay happen between the
routes/hubs. check out
Thanks nick, I think the I need to change my ISP. Do you recommend
any investigation with my ISP still the ticket open ?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 22/03/2011 20:32, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
lately I have some delay to reach my web
On 22/03/2011 21:37, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks nick, I think the I need to change my ISP. Do you recommend
any investigation with my ISP still the ticket open ?
Ask them to set up an Internet Exchange, and to transfer local traffic in
Amman, not New York. It's not difficult, and it
19 matches
Mail list logo
