I'll put a plug in for PRTG, which personally I've been using to run
visual demos of some switching features for our product; but I've
been quite impressed with the depth of capability (custom scripts
with XML, full SNMP with custom MIB compilation, NFv5/v9 collection,
auto device discovery & s
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 05:32:24 AM Pavel Dimow wrote:
> I'am thinking of using CAT6524 as access switches for our
> pure l2vpn customers. I have started reading about rate
> limiting capabilities of those switches but it I can't
> find a way to do a per port or per vlan rate limit. With
> MQC I
On Monday, May 23, 2011 02:25:26 AM Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:
> In the case of the ME3800X its a new platform but the
> nexus is three years old and it have ipv6 from the
> begining but for some reason they didnt integrate these
> two new TLV.
Right, but platforms like the 3560 and 3750 are older t
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 10:06:40 PM Pete Lumbis wrote:
> These numbers are going to be highly variable on the ASR
> and 3900. Since both of these are software based
> platforms (the ASR is a little different than
> traditional software platforms) it depends on what
> features are enabled and the
Intermapper has worked well for me for the past few years, easy to
setup, not expensive, and has the ability to make a nice graphical map
of all your devices any which way you please.
Dan.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, omar parihuana
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Please could you suggest me a NMS for
On 05/24/2011 09:59 PM, Chris Conn wrote:
Hello,
I have an 1811 that is behaving strangely; we have a few "routers"
including this one for which we do not want to send any RAs or reply to
sollicited RAs.
Do you have:
ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise
?
_
Hi,
I have been using a cisco IGX 8430 since last 6 years.
Recently the trunk line on a NTM card went down and thereafter whatever I
did, it would not come back up. In the end I thought that a reboot might fix
the problem, but once rebooted, it now does not recognize any of the other
cards
Hi Mike,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
wrote:
>
> Um, bad cable? No IP addresses? Not sure what kind of connection problem
> you are having.
I don't think his IOS is post-rapture ready.
Cheers,
Dale
___
cisco-nsp maili
Hello,
I have an 1811 that is behaving strangely; we have a few "routers"
including this one for which we do not want to send any RAs or reply to
sollicited RAs.
They are all configured essentially as:
interface FastEthernet0
ipv6 address 2001:2b8::2/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 nd ra suppress
T
On the 6500 you can only do POS so if they want something else it isn't going
to work.
If you are using the POS interface as an xconnect end-point it should do what
you want.
TDM does not work over most MPLS without significant buffering in any case.
Mack
From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@g
They'll notice..
Assuming they're doing TDM or something besides PoS over it, it won't look
the same at all.. The PoS interfaces are STS-48c only..
Maybe if they're doing just PoS it might work, but who uses PoS on OC-48
anymore? Cheaper to do 10G...
--
Tim
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, FF
Thanks for responding. I'm looking at something like this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2831/ps4370/product_data_sheet09186a0080092241.html
Will someone connecting to this for OC-48 transport between two
locations with MPLS encapsulation (xconnect) notice anything different
The POS looks like a standard 6500 layer 3 port with of course the added POS
commands.
This means standard MPLS commands should work.
The older POS cards lack some of the functionality of the newer cards.
Someone may have more information if you provide the exact line card.
Mack McBride
Network A
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Md. Jahangir Hossain
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:39 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] traffic not passing between Cisco 3750G and & Cisco 7206v
14 matches
Mail list logo
