You can try the following:
(config)#commit replace
(admin-config)#commit replace
--
Tassos
omar parihuana wrote on 03/06/2011 04:50:
Hi Guys,
I'm new in CRS-1 (IOS XR) I'm trying to reconfigure a new router
(non-production) so I decided to erase the running conf however I am not
able to
And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
which should answer all your questions:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668
Sincerely,
David.
Jeff Bacon wrote:
>> I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
>> single flow could exceed 3Gbps
Hi Joe,
You don't need MPLS to run VRF's. A VRF is just a separate routing instance
that is kept separate (like a VLAN at L2). You can run VRF's locally on the one
box even on a low end ISR if you want to try it out.
I think the suggestion would be that if you had two route tables (each in it'
> I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
> single flow could exceed 3Gbps. The PoXXX interfaces don't have
> explicit gigabit members - any chance you know where to find some
> documentation showing the single-gigabit/flow limit?
from the 4.1 config doc, page 2-8:
Hi Gert,
Thanks for the reply, I was hoping there was some way to do it with
Local-Prefs or weights setting the BGP routes from peers into a group and
then selecting that group from the routing table for the internal IP Range I
want to use those routes. I presume there is a way to setup VRFs to d
On 6/2/11 4:22 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Two things to keep in mind:
1) Any one flow cannot exceed 1 Gb/s, since the connection to the FWSM
is a 6 port etherchannel.
I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
single flow could exceed 3Gbps. The PoXXX interface
Hi Guys,
I'm new in CRS-1 (IOS XR) I'm trying to reconfigure a new router
(non-production) so I decided to erase the running conf however I am not
able to do that??? please how could I delete the run conf???
Thanks for your suggestion.
Rgds.
--
Omar E.P.T
-
Certified Networ
On 6/2/2011 3:09 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
Hi folks -
So, in an attempt to address some fun issues with NAT I'm having with my
6500s, I'm considering resorting to the use of an FWSM as a fancy
specialized NAT device - call it a complicated hairpin, if you will (one
VRF is on one side of the FWSM, on
Configuration would be a good starting point?
I am assuming you have checked all the basic things; Plugged in and powered on?
Cabled correctly (Multi or single mode cables)? Interface show fex or optic?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun..
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:09 -0500, Jeff Bacon wrote:
> I'm seeing round-trip latencies of approx 250us pushing data through the
> FWSM,
That latency sounds much like what we're seeing, around 300 us.
> and a relatively ridiculously high rate of packet loss.
Two things to keep in mind:
1) Any
Hello Nick et al.,
have to admit I was wrong - and you are right :-)
Seems to be around 4.2.0 from what I hear, confirming what Pshem said earlier.
Sorry for the noise!
Marc
On 2011-05-25, at 4:28 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 25/05/2011 14:17, Marc Binderberger wrote:
>> if I recall it righ
Hi folks -
So, in an attempt to address some fun issues with NAT I'm having with my
6500s, I'm considering resorting to the use of an FWSM as a fancy
specialized NAT device - call it a complicated hairpin, if you will (one
VRF is on one side of the FWSM, one is on the other, the VRFs
communicate
Hello Renelson,
Try this config, obviously use whatever fex#, ethernet ports, and
port-channel numbers you wish:
interface Ethernet1/32
switchport mode fex-fabric
fex associate 130
channel-group 30
esc-n5548-1# sh run int po 30
interface port-channel30
switchport mode fex-fabric
fex
Post your configuration. We've rolled quite a few of them.
On Jun 2, 2011 2:53 PM, "Renelson Panosky" wrote:
> Have anybody here is running Cisco Nexus 5548P with 2248TP. I configured
> everything but i still can't see the Cisco Nexus 2248TP. Can anyone help
me
> with this ?
>
Does anyone know if this feature is in fact supported on the
7600(RSP720-3C-GE)?
There seems to be conflicting information between the Feature Navigator and
other related documents.
According to this article, it is supported as of 12.2(33)SRB, for the 7600.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/cet
Have anybody here is running Cisco Nexus 5548P with 2248TP. I configured
everything but i still can't see the Cisco Nexus 2248TP. Can anyone help me
with this ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listi
There is a known memory hole with 6.x or certain versions of 7.x code.
Check the code of the PIX you are running and you may need to upgrade to a
more stable IOS.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:59 AM, teklay gebremichael wrote:
> hello,
> I am observing increased memory usage of my Cisco PIX firewall.
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:14:32AM -0400, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> I am wondering, is it possible to route traffic based on the Source IP to
> specific BGP learned routes? For instance, if I have IP Range
> 2.2.2.2/24that I want only to use routes learned from peerings with
> say AS 444, 555,
Hello Mack,
thanks for your e-mail.
These occur due to memory leaks in the BGP process.
Disabled BGP sessions can cause memory leakage and the type of CPU issues you
are seeing.
there are currently none on this box.
Solution is upgrade to latest 12.0(33)S train.
The PRP-1 is on 12.0(33)S
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:59 AM, teklay gebremichael
wrote:
> hello,
> I am observing increased memory usage of my Cisco PIX firewall. I tried even
> to
<...>
> pix# sh conn count
> 9597 in use, 22745 most used
> pix# sh xlate count
> 14101 in use, 26759 most used
I don't think that there is any
These occur due to memory leaks in the BGP process.
Disabled BGP sessions can cause memory leakage and the type of CPU issues you
are seeing.
Solution is upgrade to latest 12.0(33)S train.
Work around is periodic reloads and eliminating down/shutdown bgp sessions.
I am sure there are other bugs
Hello people,
before I dig too much into it, I wanted to ask whether
anyone here as experienced sth similar. Is anyone aware
of a memory leak on latest 12.0(33)S or 12.0(32)S releases
for GSR? We see our graphs constantly going down and
jump up again upon reload. Things that we see is right
now a
On 6/2/2011 9:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> have others observed unicast flooding in topologies
>> without asymmetric traffic flows but with mismatched ARP/CAM timers?
> I've seen them with default timers. I don't know if they were
> mismatched.
>
> There is a feature called unknown unicast floo
Hi
I am trying to debug several random crashes we have experienced on our 7600
based network.
I have narrowed it down to a process on the SP "Const2 IPv6 Proc". It grows in
size over time, Starting at around 8M currently the largest I have on the
network is 388M. Eventualy the SP runs out of m
On Jun 2, 2011, at 6:07 AM, Martin T wrote:
> Hi,
> rather stupid subject, but the thing is, that I have one Cisco
> WS-C2950-24 switch, which has one Motorola radio device connected to
> one of fast-ethernet ports:
>
> WS-C2950-24[Fa0/1] <-> [eth]Motorola_radio_device
>
> Problem is, that abou
Also check for stp related port blockings. Perhaps there is some sort of loop
or other weird issue the switch sees. Do a "show int status" and "show span int
f0/1" for port blocking status.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Peter Pauly
Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...
> have others observed unicast flooding in topologies
> without asymmetric traffic flows but with mismatched ARP/CAM timers?
I've seen them with default timers. I don't know if they were
mismatched.
There is a feature called unknown unicast flood blocking (UUFB). It
might be available for your
You can also try something like this:
http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/672213-ferrite-cylinder-clamp-black-28a0640-0a2.html
and put it on your ethernet cable. Even better would be to loop it
through a couple times instead of just once.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Koch wrote:
> On
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 06:07, Martin T wrote:
> Hi,
> rather stupid subject, but the thing is, that I have one Cisco
> WS-C2950-24 switch, which has one Motorola radio device connected to
> one of fast-ethernet ports:
>
> WS-C2950-24[Fa0/1] <-> [eth]Motorola_radio_device
>
> Problem is, that about
Hi Everyone,
I am wondering, is it possible to route traffic based on the Source IP to
specific BGP learned routes? For instance, if I have IP Range
2.2.2.2/24that I want only to use routes learned from peerings with
say AS 444, 555,
666. But I want to have IP Range 2.2.2.3/24 use the routes lea
On 6/2/11, geo...@dalyshome.co.uk wrote:
> I'm trying to establish consensus on best practice CAM and ARP aging
> timers for Cat6500 12.2(33)SXI5.
> Various cisco docs state these should be synched to minimise unknown
> unicast flooding. I'm looking into modifying them from the default
> values
I'm trying to establish consensus on best practice CAM and ARP aging
timers for Cat6500 12.2(33)SXI5.
Various cisco docs state these should be synched to minimise unknown
unicast flooding. I'm looking into modifying them from the default
values (ARP timer 14400 sec, MAC aging time 300 sec) to mi
Hi,
rather stupid subject, but the thing is, that I have one Cisco
WS-C2950-24 switch, which has one Motorola radio device connected to
one of fast-ethernet ports:
WS-C2950-24[Fa0/1] <-> [eth]Motorola_radio_device
Problem is, that about once every 24h this connection stops forwarding
traffic. I h
Hi Jurgen,
Many thanks for your informative response.
The firewall cannot terminate the PPP sessions so I will need to confirm
from the client the ISP details in terms of what exactly is supported.
>From my experience with PPPoA a public address is assigned to the ATM WAN
interface and typicall
Hi Aaron,
> This is not really a cisco specific question. I just need
> some clarification
> on ADSL bridging.
>
> I have a situation where an ISP will deliver a /29 address
> block over an
> ADSL connection. I assume the ADSL connection will be PPPoA /
> PPPoE based.
>
> The ADSL router is
hello,
I am observing increased memory usage of my Cisco PIX firewall. I tried even to
graph the memory usage and cpu utilization using MRTG.
the cpu utilization seems ok but the memory is almost used up even when the
link
to the internet is down. the PIX has 67MB of RAM.
i am always getting slo
36 matches
Mail list logo
