Is the same in 7600
El 15/06/11 18:46, vinny_abe...@dell.com escribió:
Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
Sent: Wednesday, June
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:25:39AM +0200, LM wrote:
Is the same in 7600
Except that PFC4 is not even on the roadmap there.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
I just saw this email going over the release notes now. I did not see that
CSCtn94753 was fixed but only skimming over right now.
Flex links looks pretty interesting along with Orphan port shutdown.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi All
We are having an issue with a ring of 3 ASR9010 and one 7606
Sup7203BXL with 6704-DFC3BLX.
The LCs facing the 7606 crash and reload randomly (once they have
reloaded at the same time).
Both cards are in slot 0/2 and have if Te0/2/0/0 facing the 7606.
All the ASR machines have the same
I have setup a couple 881's to do a Dynamic site to site vpn tunnel back to
my ASA at the head end.
All traffic ends up stopping even thou the tunnel is still up. If I start
some traffic from the 881 than the traffic starts working from the head end
(ASA side).
What have I missed to get traffic
Hi:
thanks for all the information about the scripting problem.
I find now basically there are two kind of method to do the work.
1.interactive CLI, with 3rd party tools or expect-like perl modules.
2. snmpset. but it can not be done directly, snmpset just trigger the
tftp procedure.
I
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:45:56, Scott Voll wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] Newb Question about site to site vpn
I have setup a couple 881's to do a Dynamic site to site vpn tunnel
back to my ASA at the head end.
All traffic ends up stopping even thou the tunnel is still up. If I
start
One way we've done things like this is to generate all the config
changes required and throw it in a plain text file. Then you use
another script to log into the router and copy the file up to the
router via tftp. This allows you to make almost any kind of changes
you need while only having to
Hi,
Is anyone from Cisco able to confirm if IPv6 is supported when using
the IOS based SSL VPN feature (inside the VPN)?
The AnyConnect VPN client has a field for Client Address (IPv6) but
I can't see how to enable it on the router.
Using 15.0(1)M6 on the router and AnyConnect 2.5 on the client.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110616/84e5172b/attachment-0001.pgp
On 6/16/11 14:25 , Wyatt Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
Hi All
We are having an issue with a ring of 3 ASR9010 and one 7606
Sup7203BXL with 6704-DFC3BLX.
Hi,
Because problem occurs on multiple chassis I would guess hardware
problems are unlikely.
Have you performed software upgrade after you
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:00:19AM -0700, manderson wrote:
Sounds like you maybe have it set up in client mode vs. network mode
That was a particularily nice example of a completely useless mail.
Full-Quoting a *Digest* with 8 individual mails in there, two different
threads, and nothing
What is the configuration difference?
--scott
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM, manderson chief...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like you maybe have it set up in client mode vs. network mode
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:26 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net
wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Mason wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone from Cisco able to confirm if IPv6 is supported when using
the IOS based SSL VPN feature (inside the VPN)?
The AnyConnect VPN client has a field for Client Address (IPv6) but
I can't see how to enable it on the
Hi,
IOS SSL VPN doesn¹t currently support IPv6 for SVC. See Features Not
Supported on the Cisco IOS SSL VPN
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/
guide/sec_ssl_vpn_ps10591_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1
502587
It works quite well on ASA
Hey all,
We're looking at implementing VSS between our distribution/core switches,
which are currently in a high-availability configuration using HSRP.
From my research so far, the system is straight-forward and the limitations
and requirements are fairly well documented.
Has anyone had
I have connected two Cisco 1841 routers over poor quality POTS cabling
using the Ethernet over VDSL2(profile 17a) converters. SNR is rather
low and distance is long. Currently I have two POTS wires in use, but
I could use another pair as well if this would help. I was wondering
maybe it would help
IOS SSL VPN doesn¹t currently support IPv6 for SVC. See Features Not
Supported on the Cisco IOS SSL VPN
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/
guide/sec_ssl_vpn_ps10591_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1
502587
Does anyone (Cisco people?)
On Friday, June 17, 2011, Mike G gee...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had personal experience with a VSS deployment? If so, do you
have any horror stories, caveats, and/or recommendations? I'm also
interested in people's experience with IPv6 implementation in a VSS
environment.
We have 5 VSS
I consider that the same platform. ;)
-Vinny
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:25 AM, LM asturlui...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the same in 7600
El 15/06/11 18:46, vinny_abe...@dell.com escribió:
Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From:
Because you are essential increasing the gauge of wire, and therefore
decreasing the resistance, you *should* have less loss. Telco's have used this
in the past to extend DSL beyond the distance limitations before, (although not
common, each pair in the ground is not a cheap commodity)
If
Thanks for the great feedback Andrew! Did you ever discover the cause of
the crash? Also, was the 20 second outage due to the delay in the
active-hot sup taking over or was it something else?
On Jun 16, 2011 4:15 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011, Mike G
On Friday, June 17, 2011, Mike G gee...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the great feedback Andrew! Did you ever discover the cause of the
crash? Also, was the 20 second outage due to the delay in the active-hot sup
taking over or was it something else?
Iirc - the crash logs reported a cache
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote:
I was afraid of that. Thanks for the info... Is the Sup2T available yet or is
that still forthcoming?
Forthcoming. Don't bet your career on it though. Of course, Duke Nukem
Forever just got released...
--
Tim:
Thank you again Andrew, I appreciate the info!
Has anyone else run into problems? Have you heard of others having
problems?
Or, have you had a really successful VSS implementation and have no
complaints?
I would love to hear some more opinions on VSS.
-MikeG
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM,
The missing IPv6 nameservers issue is described in BugID CSCtg92043.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kaj Niemi
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:43 PM
To: Chris Mason
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
26 matches
Mail list logo
