Hey,
I'm wonder what's up with access to IOS software for EOL/EOS hardware
for example 3600 router serises EOL is 31 dec 2008. Downdload section
still saying I need contract to download, while it's been EOS for years.
Maybe I miss something and it not completely EOS?
Yes we still using these
Normal Configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet5/2
ip address x.x.x.x
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
media-type rj45
MTU is default 1500
-Original Message-
From: Scott Granados
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 5:25 PM
To: Manaf Al Oqlah ; Group Study ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
Hello Cisco -nsp group,
My CCNP certificate is about to expire and want to renew it with CCIE SP
written exam, can someone help me to find CCIE SP V3 (350-02) book? From
where i can get this book or someone please mail me the soft copy if you
have, it will be great help.
Thank You
Regards
Four
On 2011-10-03, at 11:37 PM, Mack McBride wrote:
> The 7600 and ASR9000 use a lot of similar hardware (Cisco didn't reinvent the
> wheel they just added rims).
Where?
> The ASR line cards resemble the ES series on the 7600.
Where? If one is using an ES port on a 7600, I'd assume one is likely
The 7600 and ASR9000 use a lot of similar hardware (Cisco didn't reinvent the
wheel they just added rims).
The ASR line cards resemble the ES series on the 7600.
The 7600 is a more 'mature' platform but as Mark notes there
is a completely different architecture at the OS level.
Roland noted that
check into the following bug
bug id: CSCti80308
i have hit this in other c4k chassis with different cards, but the result is
the same.
regards,
q.
-= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =-
On Oct 3, 2011, at 17:55, Martin T wrote:
I have a following setup:
WS-C2960G-
On Oct 3, 2011, at 2:06 AM, Michał Grzybczyk wrote:
> Any opinion which one is the better choice for a core network ?
The ASR9K is a much better choice for the peering/transit edge, as it produces
operationally useful NetFlow telemetry and allows per-interface uRPF settings,
and doesn't have bi
On Monday, October 03, 2011 10:39:01 AM John Elliot wrote:
> Thanks(everyone) - The 7200 has a number of dot1q
> subints, can I disable proxy arp on the physical gig
> int(i.e. will this apply the setting to all the dot1q
> ints), or must it be disabled on all dot1q subints?
We do both - on the p
On Monday, October 03, 2011 02:06:16 AM Michał Grzybczyk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any opinion which one is the better choice for a core
> network ? How much different is OS on ASR 9000 in
> comparizon to IOS ? If I know IOS there is no problem to
> operate it ?
>
> Assuming that I need MPLS, VPLS, H-QO
I have a following setup:
WS-C2960G-24TC-L[Gi0/22] <-> [Gi3/4]WS-C4506
SFP in WS-C2960G-24TC-L is a noname 1000BASE-LX10 transceiver working
thanks to "service unsupported-transceiver". GBIC in WS-C4506 is an
Avago AFCT-5611Z 1000BASE-LX10. Linecard model in WS-C4506 is
WS-X4306-GB.
I had a situ
Hi Rick,
> We have seen issues with the frame relay interface loosing EIGRP
> neighbor without actually dropping the frame relay interface - which
> would give us an interface down alarm.
Unfortunately no traps in the CISCO-EIGRP-MIB for neighbor changes.
If SNMP-polling is an option you could ch
Is there a specific SNMP trap that can be sent in the event that the default
route flips from one interface to another? In particular I want to know if the
default route changes from T1 to 3gHWIC in Cisco ISR platforms.
If not via SNMP trap what are other ways of knowing when the default route
On 02/10/2011, at 12:03 PM, Martin T wrote:
> In addition, as I checked the 4900 series as well, do built in X2
> ports(the ones in the chassis http://mcaf.ee/us1dt) in 4900M support
> "TwinGig Converter Module"? According to documentation they don't. Any
> experience with this?
Only the 8-port X2
On 03/10/2011 20:57, Paul Cosgrove wrote:
> I think you may have an error there. Your calculations suggest that
> traffic in on a 1Gbps interface will fill a 1.3M Byte receive buffer in a
> little under a 1/10 of a second. While the preamble and inter frame gap
> will slow the buffer fill rate (t
Hi Nick,
I think you may have an error there. Your calculations suggest that traffic
in on a 1Gbps interface will fill a 1.3M Byte receive buffer in a little
under a 1/10 of a second. While the preamble and inter frame gap will slow
the buffer fill rate (the degree depending on the packet size),
On 03/10/2011 14:47, Manaf Al Oqlah wrote:
> What is the maximum traffic that a gigabit Ethernet interface can handle
> on Cisco 7600 router RSP720-3C-GE before dropping packets . we are able
> to reach 750 mbps / 125 mbps input/out rate!
The maximum traffic that a gigabit Ethernet interface can h
Depends on the traffic type, packet sizes and what features you have
enabled. Can you detail the port configurationa bit more?
-Original Message-
From: Manaf Al Oqlah
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 9:47 AM
To: Group Study ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Maximum traffic o
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:47 +0300, Manaf Al Oqlah wrote:
> What is the maximum traffic that a gigabit Ethernet interface can
> handle on Cisco 7600 router RSP720-3C-GE before dropping packets . we
> are able to reach 750 mbps / 125 mbps input/out rate!
It would depend on what kind of line card you
Hi,
What is the maximum traffic that a gigabit Ethernet interface can handle on
Cisco 7600 router RSP720-3C-GE before dropping packets . we are able to reach
750 mbps / 125 mbps input/out rate!
thank you
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth
hi
i forgot to add that as for the PPPOE model the downstream ISP self
provision the ADSL services with the NAS and Radius
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:47 PM, K bharathan wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner)
> wrote:
>
>> I am not completely sure about the PPPoE mod
20 matches
Mail list logo
