Is UDLD Aggressive Mode supported in VSS 12.2(33)SXI4?
VSS Interface Gi1/1/1 is connected to a C3750X (interface DOWN, SFP issue
on VSS, 12.2(53)SE2).
I expect VSS interface Gi1/1/1 to be put ErrDisabled but no way, it stayed
UP :(
VSS#show udld gigabitEthernet 1/1/1
Interface Gi1/1/1
---
Port e
Hi Jason,
You might consider http://www.nil.com/solutions/e-learning-with-remote-labs/
All the best,
Dana Konkin
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations for reputable, Cisco-centric online
> training courses for things like BGP and Switch
What we have done is order one legit optic so we can get around the "TAC" issue
when we call and then we tend to use finisar or merge for our optics.
Nary an issue yet and oddly I feel happy that I am not being asked to grab the
far side of the desk.
Michael Balasko
CCSP,CCNP,MCSE,SCP
Network Sp
Does anyone have any recommendations for reputable, Cisco-centric online
training courses for things like BGP and Switched Networks (VLAN, etc)?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
arch
I have an edge Router that I am trying to get up and running as VRF based
IPSEC concentrator. Its currently running Version 12.2(18)SXF17b Adv Ent
Ideally I would like to use Global Loopback IPs to terminate the Peering and
layer 3 Port-channel .1q Sub Interfaces.
Specifically I have a 6509-E w
We have SRD1 as the code version the case is open under.
However it appears to effect a wider range of code.
Possibly up to current latest 15.1 releases.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: Steven Raymond [mailto:sraym...@bluehost.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 8:26 AM
To: Mack McBride
C
On 07/11/11 17:56, Scott Voll wrote:
unfortunatelyit all came from a very large customer..
They were using 3rd party stuff and things were failing. couldn't figure
it out told cisco to figure it out or they were going to rip
everything out.
Cisco sent staff and found that the fiber
unfortunatelyit all came from a very large customer..
They were using 3rd party stuff and things were failing. couldn't figure
it out told cisco to figure it out or they were going to rip everything
out.
Cisco sent staff and found that the fiber transciever they were using was
over
On Nov 2, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Mack McBride wrote:
> I am having the same problem and have a case open with Cisco.
> We use the 7600s as route reflectors to a number of neighbors (20+).
> BGP is a high priority process and the number of packets exchanged is huge
> (100K?).
> Of course they all have
On 07/11/11 14:09, Michael Robson wrote:
After seeing how much money there is to be saved from using third
party optics instead of Cisco branded ones, we finally bought a few
to try. We have encountered no issues with using 10Gbps xenpaks, we
plugged them in and they just worked. However, we did
After seeing how much money there is to be saved from using third party optics
instead of Cisco branded ones, we finally bought a few to try. We have
encountered no issues with using 10Gbps xenpaks, we plugged them in and they
just worked. However, we did notice that DOM support was missing for
I'm pretty sure the peer link was up when i configured this. I tried shut/no
shut now, and it removed adminCfgChange but now it's in Administratively
shutdown.
I'd like to note that this happened on two ports now, i tried to move them
after this occurred, but the result was the same.
I could
Not specifically on ISR's, but we ran BGP timers of 1/5 on iBGP peers for years
without issue. That included LAN, metro dark fibre, and interstate managed
ethernet attached devices. In the mix of devices were various generations of
7200's which would have far less control plane processing pow
13 matches
Mail list logo
