Hi Gert,
On 16/12/2011, at 6:40 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> We've used EIGRP on PE-CE links in the past and used prefix-list filters
> incoming and outoing to enforce policy - which worked as well as for BGP,
> and it's about the same amount of config work, so I think that approach
> is fine.
Below
You gonna need DATA license to enable MPLS capabilities.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10616/white_paper_c11_556985.html#wp9000809
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Righa Shake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am trying to configure MPLS on a cisco 3945 with the below features however
> t
Hi,
Am trying to configure MPLS on a cisco 3945 with the below features however
the command mpls ip, or tag-switching are not accessible.
System image file is "flash0:c3900e-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T1.bin"
Technology Package License Information for Module:'c3900e'
--
Jay,
You may also want to look at NBAR and NBAR2 capabilities on the ASR1K.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 22:43
To: Jay Nakamura
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject:
This provides a type of overview
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
although your milage will change based on which software features you enable.
On 17/12/2011, at 6:34 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> As I've mentioned before a couple of times on
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 11:53:42 PM Gert Doering
wrote:
> To complement what Jared said: The NPE-G1/G2 are
> software forwarding platforms, so you get the maximum in
> flexibility, but the G1 will NOT give you 1gbit/s of
> forwarding performance. The G2 is supposed to (but I've
> not per
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 03:08:15PM +0100, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> ok, nevertheless, what can I expect from these 4 processors / plattforms ?
> As far as I found NPE-G1 / NPE-G2 will have SW updates till 2013/2015.
>
> What throughput can bigger/newer plattform like Sup32/ASR provide with
> net
On Dec 17, 2011, at 9:08 AM, Rolf Hanßen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, nevertheless, what can I expect from these 4 processors / plattforms ?
> As far as I found NPE-G1 / NPE-G2 will have SW updates till 2013/2015.
>
> What throughput can bigger/newer plattform like Sup32/ASR provide with
> netflow ?
t
Hi,
ok, nevertheless, what can I expect from these 4 processors / plattforms ?
As far as I found NPE-G1 / NPE-G2 will have SW updates till 2013/2015.
What throughput can bigger/newer plattform like Sup32/ASR provide with
netflow ?
kind regards
Rolf
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:37:59PM +
On Friday, December 16, 2011 09:21:02 AM Andrew Miehs wrote:
> I wouldn't buy a new 7200 nowerdays - they are not that
> much cheaper than the ASR1001s (if at all).
Unless you're buying them on the used market.
The 7200's are still useful if you require port density,
especially for non-Ethernet
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 02:09:56 AM Thomas Bowlby
wrote:
> I currently see two options for configuring ospf:
> option1:infinity metric (max-metric router-lsa)
> pros:ease of configuration; creates a
> 'stub' router-effectively advertising router-lsa with
> metric 65535 cons
On Friday, December 16, 2011 04:43:03 AM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> Cisco SCE. For other vendors look at Sandvine, Arbor,
> Procera, Ipoque. Or build your own open-source DPI
> gateway, 100~200 Mbps is something that a good PC can
> handle.
Back in the day, we use the ET (Emerging Technologies)
bandwi
On Friday, December 16, 2011 11:14:07 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> Wish Cisco would actually save these parts of the config
> but having a recoverable device isn't a priority
> apparently.
Well, the same goes for SSH keys and SNMPv3 activations.
These are the 2 bits I've found are easy to forget when
13 matches
Mail list logo
