On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
We are rolling out a small network utilizing ME3400E in REP "ring"
topology, providing L3 "VPNs" using VRF-lite and OSPF.
Are there any particular pitfalls we should watch for with this
configuration w.r.t. rolling out IPv6 in the future?
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 04:28:55 AM Andrew Hoyos
wrote:
> IIRC, there is two different versions of the CER, the
> "CER" and "CER-RT", the latter having 1.5mil v4 FIB.
That, then, could be it.
When we were looking at Brocade back in 2009, there was only
the CER2000 and the CES2000.
The
We are rolling out a small network utilizing ME3400E in REP "ring"
topology, providing L3 "VPNs" using VRF-lite and OSPF.
Are there any particular pitfalls we should watch for with this
configuration w.r.t. rolling out IPv6 in the future?
___
cisco-nsp m
Sure .. here it is. Thanks ...
Paul
version 12.2
no service pad
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
service timestamps debug datetime localtime
service timestamps log datetime localtime
service password-encryption
service compress-config
!
hostname acs1-con-mb
!
boot-start-mark
Thanks very much..
We did reboot it a few weeks back - we find we need to kick these boxes
about once a year or other weird stuff happens ;)
I missed the fact that it is only showing INPUT - good catch and I will
follow up on that.
Nothing has changed but we did migrate Radius platforms
On 01/10/2012 07:11 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi there.
We have some 7206VXR's in place for BRAS functions. They have functioned
very well for a number of years..
Can you just post your config?
Mike-
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net
Just came back up -- thanks to anyone/everyone that moved this issue
forward.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 3:00 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: www.ipv6.cisco.com down for 5+ days
I sent an email to the o
Hi Paul,
Has anything changed on the box that might have caused it to cease functioning
? Have you rebooted it (shouldn't need to, but just in case) ?
The output you've given below seems to only show an INPUT policer, is there a
corresponding output policer on the virtual interface ?
Have you
On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 08:59:43 PM Eugeniu Patrascu
> wrote:
>
>> they advertise it as 512k ipv6 and 1.5mil ipv4 iirc.
>
> That's interesting - I pulled down the data sheets for the
> CER2000, and it does say 1,500,000 for v4 in FIB + 256
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 08:59:43 PM Eugeniu Patrascu
wrote:
> they advertise it as 512k ipv6 and 1.5mil ipv4 iirc.
That's interesting - I pulled down the data sheets for the
CER2000, and it does say 1,500,000 for v4 in FIB + 256,000
for v6 in FIB.
This is weird, because I know v4 was 512
Hi there.
We have some 7206VXR's in place for BRAS functions. They have functioned
very well for a number of years..
Recently (past couple of months it seems) we have discovered that
rate-limiting isn't working any longer - suddenly it seems.
Example customer (connected to DSLAM via AD
Hi colleagues!
Could you help me with such moment:
- there is Cisco Catalyst WS-3750G-24TS-E1U Switch ;
- I want to install on it c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.150-1.SE2.bin;
Will I have access to all Advanced L3 Functions (OSPF, BGP, VRF-Lite, etc.)
of the 15.x IP Services IOS Image specific
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:43, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Monday, January 09, 2012 02:12:42 AM Eugeniu Patrascu
> wrote:
>
>> if you want something else than cisco, you may want to
>> take a look at brocade cer2000 routers/switches.
>> 1U, has support for 10GE interfaces.
>> list price for a 24 port G
On 10/01/2012 10:54, Mark Tinka wrote:
> And those who prefer low-tech. will simply filter longer
> prefixes (where longer prefixes may mean different things to
> different people).
I'm already filtering most of the longer prefixes from distant ASNs.
This doesn't have too much impact if you're n
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:56:13 AM Mack McBride wrote:
> This is definitely in the roadmap from discussions with
> Cisco. However a firm date hasn't been given.
> It appears to be fairly high priority as the routing
> table is growing and the 6500s and Nexus 7Ks aren't
> going to get any lar
On Monday, January 09, 2012 02:12:42 AM Eugeniu Patrascu
wrote:
> if you want something else than cisco, you may want to
> take a look at brocade cer2000 routers/switches.
> 1U, has support for 10GE interfaces.
> list price for a 24 port GE model starts at around
> $12-14k and it's very cheap com
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:30:12PM -0500, Pawlowski, Maciej wrote:
> I thought about this, but I'm not sure if PPP/L2TP session is similar to
> other PPP (I have no experience with L2TP).
It is. L2TP is just a method to encapsulate PPP frames into UDP.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clic
17 matches
Mail list logo
