hello,
you can configure a static default vrf-aware route point to next hop
address of internet gateway router in global table:
i.e
ip route vrf CUST 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 20.20.20.2 global
BR,
Mohamed
On 1/19/12, Erik Sundberg esundb...@nitelusa.com wrote:
I am trying to figure a way to import a
Hi All,
I'm now lab'ing up a 7609-R for deployment in the near future. It has
a single RSP720-3CXL-GE in it. What I want to know is, all of you that
have or do run 7600's, what are your real world failure rates of the
RSP modules?
I can have dual RSPs but how likely are they too fail? I want to
hi
any clues on the cheapest way of interconnecting branches and hq with adsl!
which cisco equipment can be ideal fo this
thanks
-bharathan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
It depends on how many branches and your requirements (Egress QoS,
IPSEC, etc?), but the ISR and ISR-G2 series of routers are ideal for
this. I have used these previously in combination with IPSEC and DMVPN
over ADSL to connect lots of branches (Cisco 87x and 18xx) to
centralised hub sites (Cisco
On 1/20/12 13:30 , K bharathan wrote:
hi
any clues on the cheapest way of interconnecting branches and hq with adsl!
which cisco equipment can be ideal fo this
thanks
Depends on speed of DSL line, additional features like VPN etc. 88x and
89x DSL bundles should be enough for branches in
On 1/20/12 13:30 , K bharathan wrote:
hi
any clues on the cheapest way of interconnecting branches and hq with adsl!
which cisco equipment can be ideal fo this
thanks
Depends on speed of DSL line, additional features like VPN etc. 88x and
89x DSL bundles should be enough for branches in
Have you considered the command import ipv4 unicast under the vrf
definition?
Check the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ios_xe/iproute_bgp/configuration/gui
de/irg_sup_ip_pref_xe.html
Hope this helps.
-Mensaje original-
De: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
I think that should you consider different platforms... SmartEdge or MX...
those are more stable for that purpose,
[ ]'s,
Thiago Lizardo de Moraes
2012/1/19 Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com
Hello,
I am considering going to a cisco 7201 for PPPoE subscriber
termination, and I
apologies for length and soul-baring
On 18/01/12 14:07, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Gert, hardware upgrades need to happen; otherwise we would all be stuck
using bus interfaces designed in the early 1990s. Nobody likes paying for
I tend to agree with this. Our sup720 have been really REALLY
That said: the sup2T would have been a KILLER box if it had been
delivered on time. Now: not so much. The slow delivery and presence of
the N7k give me cause for concern. The roadmap out to space year 3000
rings a bit false, frankly...
On the other hand, if I understand correctly, the 6500 BU
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:23:24PM +, Jeff Bacon wrote:
I love my 6500s. You'll pry 'em from my cold dead fingers. Unless
someone really does show me something that can do what they do better.
Heh :-) seconded.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
I used the IP traffic export last year on a 3925. Seemed to work without
issue. Was a lightly used circuit at the time, can't comment on the CPU
impact, if there is any.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hi,
I've got two-month lead times on my sup2t orders.
aye. we had to fight hard to get ours...and they went into
service pretty quick!
What I'm seeing is a lack of discounting, so to speak. And
so much demandso why reduce the price? the early people
wanting access to the platform will
On 1/20/2012 10:19 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
;-) there'll also be a deluge of sup720 blades for those people still on sup2
or sup32
from all the sup2t upgraders
Yeah, hopefully VS720s too...
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 01/20/2012 02:23 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
So I don't. It makes for an interesting network in a way, because
I am taking 2-3 layers and collapsing them all into one switch - but
I can because the 6500 lets me, and lets me do it so trivially easy.
We do much the same.
I love my 6500s. You'll
I apologize for hijacking this thread but it appears we have a lot of NetFlow
attention here and I want to keep the momentum for my own use :)
We currently utilize netflow in conjunction with Cisco MARs for security
incident management of our ~2,000 remote sites. We also use CA's NetQoS for
Hi,
I got some money to upgrade my network infrastructure from 1Gbps to 10Gbps.
At the moment I have a cat6509E with a Sup720. This system has been
working fine for 6 years. The upgrade will have to last a similar number
of years and our main requirement is throughput with minimal routing if
Alessandra Forti alessandra.fo...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
I got some money to upgrade my network infrastructure from 1Gbps to
10Gbps.
At the moment I have a cat6509E with a Sup720. This system has been
working fine for 6 years. The upgrade will have to last a similar
number
of years and our main
So, 2 slots for sup720's and fill the rest of the slots with 6704's
and you can do 28 line rate 10G ports. Packet rate can get a bit
dicey when it gets really high on the 6704's but other than that,
fairly solid cards. Minimal routing means that you should be able to
use that Sup720 for a while.
On 20.01.2012, at 21:14, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Alessandra Forti alessandra.fo...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
I got some money to upgrade my network infrastructure from 1Gbps to
10Gbps.
At the moment I have a cat6509E with a Sup720. This system has been
working fine for 6
The 6[78]16 cards are only 40g. Each 4 port group has 10g. We have some, and
frankly they're a bit awkward because of this.
the 6[78]16 are the only 10GBASE-T though and I'm trying to keep it simple.
cheers
alessandra
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
How far do you plan to expand in the next 6 years?
We currently have 10 racks and planning to add another two in the next 3
months. Considering the density of cpu power is increasing I calculated
around 16 racks in the next 6 years.
The rack switches will also be 10GBASE-T. This allows me
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:19, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm now lab'ing up a 7609-R for deployment in the near future. It has
a single RSP720-3CXL-GE in it. What I want to know is, all of you that
have or do run 7600's, what are your real world failure rates of the
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Blake Dunlap wrote:
Are they more likely to fail the other line cards? It doesn't seem
very common practice to have to of every card in the chassis and
provide customers with a port on two switching modules for example, so
why dual RSPs? Are they *that* much more likely to
On 01/20/2012 10:11 PM, Alessandra Forti wrote:
The 6[78]16 cards are only 40g. Each 4 port group has 10g. We have
some, and frankly they're a bit awkward because of this.
the 6[78]16 are the only 10GBASE-T though and I'm trying to keep it simple.
If you want it to last 6 years, I think
25 matches
Mail list logo
