Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x

2012-06-29 Thread Doug McIntyre
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:55:32AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > On 6/30/12 1:24 AM, N. Max Pierson wrote: > > I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the > > confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running > > run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/ins

[c-nsp] nexus 5010 error %STP-2-VLAN_PORT_LIMIT_EXCEEDED:

2012-06-29 Thread Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
Hi all. Can someone give me a hint about what I might be looking for, or how can I track this. %STP-2-VLAN_PORT_LIMIT_EXCEEDED: The number of vlan-port instances (3300) exceeded [MST mode] recommended limit of 3140. We use nexus 5010 with vpc and the Nexus2K are dualhomed. The Nexus5010 are con

[c-nsp] etherchannel cisco to checkpoint VSX

2012-06-29 Thread selamat pagi
Hi We are experiencing an issue with the etherchannel between a cisco 3750 and checkpoint VSX. The channel comes up but no traffic is passing through. (not even ping between the directly connected interfaces is sucessful) On both boxes is ARP shown as incomplete). On the switch side we trest

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x

2012-06-29 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
On 6/30/12 1:24 AM, N. Max Pierson wrote: I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/insert variable for hardware here/. I think they went real awry with the 7200 ha

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x

2012-06-29 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
On 6/29/12 10:09 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. Yes. (Though I'm wondering how 15.1S-for-7600 and 15.1S-for-others relate... IOS trains, feature distribution and hardware support is more cloudy than ever) 15.1S i

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x

2012-06-29 Thread N. Max Pierson
> Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. Understood Gert. I think that for simplification purposes, Cisco has somewhat taken the confusion out of what the 'latest' train would be for any device running run IOS. Now it's simply 15.x/insert variable for

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K limitations

2012-06-29 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:56:06PM +, MKS wrote: > We are in the process of evaluating the ASR9K as a next gen platform > > I would like to ask you, what was most surprising about the platform, > e.g. I expected that to be there, or this is a strange limitation. > Does the ASR9K halv the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9001 IOS-XR, no image

2012-06-29 Thread Vinny Abello
On 6/25/2012 11:34 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Vinny Abello wrote: > >> I recently just received a few ASR-9001 routers and was surprised to find >> they did not come with the required IOS-XR 4.2.1 image at all and are >> effectively paperweights. > > I had observe

[c-nsp] FC connections between N5k and Brocade switches

2012-06-29 Thread Lars Christensen
Hi all In a large project I'm going to migrate a Brocade FC network to a Nexus 5k FC network. The network consist of a Brocade core switch with a large number of HP C7000 chassis with blade-SAN switches from Brocade (yes, all times 2 for the other fabric). My initial thought is to create the N

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 w/ WS-SUP720-3B IOS 15.x

2012-06-29 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:04:44PM -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote: > Thanks for all on/off list replies. It seems that 15.1 is what we'll go > with based on the feedback. Always keep in mind that this is 15.1*S*, not 15.1 - completely different IOS train. (Though I'm wondering how 15.1S-for-760