Re: [c-nsp] Broadband Model suggestion?

2012-07-18 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On 12-07-12 3:37 PM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote: Hi, On Jul 12, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Frank Norman wrote: ... Now can someone tell me 1) what are the standard models (PPPoE or DHCP ? ) that are being used in such kind of broadband networks?? and which is more flexible?? Both are fine from

[c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question

2012-07-18 Thread simon thomason
Hi All, Not certain if anyone can help but I have configured a new set of 5k for LAN fine all up and running but struggling with the SAN config. Current I have storage attacked to the 5k fine but the problem i am having is with the B22HP. I can see the ethernet ports fine and in DCNM see the

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question

2012-07-18 Thread Lars Christensen
Hi Simon, Show us your config and we'll give you the answer. Regards, Lars Christensen CCIE #20292 Sendt fra min iPhone Den 18/07/2012 kl. 11.40 skrev simon thomason sap...@sapage.net: Hi All, Not certain if anyone can help but I have configured a new set of 5k for LAN fine all up and

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question

2012-07-18 Thread Ryan West
Have you applied the QoS policies needed for FCoE? What do your virtual FC interfaces show? You should see something like vfc# is trunking with a VSAN up and the proper FCoE VLAN listed. Here's an example of non SAN boot FCoE config: interface Ethernet2/4 description To esx4 CNA port1

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

2012-07-18 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
That's correct. 6PE/6VPE will be supported in 15.2(4)S, Q3Cy12. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:56 PM To: 'Pshem Kowalczyk' Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

2012-07-18 Thread Aaron
Thanks Waris, sharing with community in case they wanted to know too yes sir, and also my SE told me this morning same On the ME3600, yes 6VPE is planned for release 15.2(4)S.The release is planned to be on CCO by 7/30. -Original Message- From: Waris Sagheer (waris)

[c-nsp] global.xls?

2012-07-18 Thread Jason Gurtz
Is this file still maintained/made available? Mine is from 24-sep-2010 and there's been a lot of new stuff since then and I rely on that for budgeting projects. ~JasonG ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] global.xls?

2012-07-18 Thread Chuck Church
I assume you're talking about the global price list. If you've got the right CCO privileges, you can download it. It's updated daily. I think you need 'reseller' or 'buys direct from Cisco' status to get access. Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] global.xls?

2012-07-18 Thread Jason Gurtz
I assume you're talking about the global price list. If you've got the right CCO privileges, you can download it. It's updated daily. I think you need 'reseller' or 'buys direct from Cisco' status to get access. Awesome, I don't have that access but last time I think our rep supplied it

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question

2012-07-18 Thread John Gill
I agree, this sounds like the default QoS policy is applied, and the default FCoE policy needs to be used instead. Step 2 from Ryan's link. Regards, John Gill cisco On 7/18/12 6:37 AM, Ryan West wrote: Have you applied the QoS policies needed for FCoE? What do your virtual FC interfaces

Re: [c-nsp] global.xls?

2012-07-18 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:22:10 -0400, you wrote: I assume you're talking about the global price list. If you've got the right CCO privileges, you can download it. It's updated daily. I think you need 'reseller' or 'buys direct from Cisco' status to get access. A partner can provide access to

Re: [c-nsp] global.xls?

2012-07-18 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 18/07/2012 20:22, Chuck Church wrote: I assume you're talking about the global price list. If you've got the right CCO privileges, you can download it. It's updated daily. I think you need 'reseller' or 'buys direct from Cisco' status to get access. Have to say, it is very frustrating

[c-nsp] Cisco A9K and third party SFP issues

2012-07-18 Thread TomTom40502
Anyone else having issues with Vertex CWDM SFPs not functioning on the 20x1GE in a MOD80-TR running asr9k-os-mbi-4.0.1? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question

2012-07-18 Thread simon thomason
Hi All, Thanks for all the replies but found the issues has nothing to do with the config on the nexus but the new G8 hp blades. On the bios you have to set the personality to fcoe then allow boot from SAN which brings up the FCOE options. Upon reboot the bios locks for a little while (don't

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco A9K and third party SFP issues

2012-07-18 Thread Xu Hu
Try to search one command to type into Cisco equipment, by default cannot recognise the third party transceiver. Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 19 Jul, 2012, at 4:41, TomTom40502 tomtom40...@charter.net wrote: Anyone else having issues with Vertex CWDM SFPs not functioning on the 20x1GE in a

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco A9K and third party SFP issues

2012-07-18 Thread Matt Addison
transceiver permit pid all On the interface And service unsupported-transceiver In global. Sent from my iPad On Jul 18, 2012, at 21:18, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote: Try to search one command to type into Cisco equipment, by default cannot recognise the third party transceiver.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco A9K and third party SFP issues

2012-07-18 Thread Xu Hu
I remember usually I just type the global command, then it works. Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 19 Jul, 2012, at 9:48, Matt Addison matt.addi...@lists.evilgeni.us wrote: transceiver permit pid all On the interface And service unsupported-transceiver In global. Sent from my iPad On

[c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-18 Thread Jennifer Pruett
Good day! Question for any BGP guru's; we have a couple of ASR routers as our border routers which are advertising a few /19's. The question is not directly related to the ASR hardware, but the process and best practice of aggregating PI assigned space. If we advertise our /19's via ISP1 and ISP2

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-18 Thread Tony
Hi Jen, You can do that. All of your traffic for the /24 will come to you via ISP3 as this is a more specific match than the /19 it is part of. If you drop your link to ISP3, then your /24 traffic will then be received via one of the /19's you advertise to ISP1 ISP2. If this is your