I've done dot1q-tunnel on a 3550 before so I know they support it and it's
likely your 3560 will too. Feature navigator might help you out as to which
switches support this. Config given below looks good. You need the same on both
sides, which is to add the "dot1q-tunnel" commands to the custome
Hi,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-fhrp.html#wp1064200
Example: Configuring HSRP Global IPv6 Addresses
The following example shows HSRP global IPv6 addresses with an explicitly
configured link-local address:
Router 1
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 192.168.1
Just turn on v2, v4 and v6 will require distinct id's. When you first turn
on v2 on a single router, the two will stop talking so be prepared for the
outage on v4.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.n
Of course, how else would you run HSRP for dual-stacked servers.
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: Gmail [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:20 PM
To: David Prall
Cc: Nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HSRPv1 and HSRPv2
Thanks for your replay.
So yo
Thanks for your replay.
So you mean the configuration can be done in the same interface?
V4 and V6 require distinct Id means the group number is in different range?
Sent from my iPad
On 2012-8-18, at 9:13, "David Prall" wrote:
> Just turn on v2, v4 and v6 will require distinct id's. When you f
Hi Experts,
Understood that such question need to real test in the lab, but don't have same
series equipment so far, so...
Does anybody have any experience to configure the HSRPv1 and HSRPv2 in 7609,
the thing is the current network just deploy IPv4 service, running some
sub-interface with HSRP
Only the port that does the actual double-tagging will need to be configured.
From a 3750 I just set up for a customer:
system mtu 1998
system mtu jumbo 9000
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/1
description TAGGED UPLINK
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2302
switchp
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Chris Lane wrote:
>
> > to follow up, once i added v6 to the router and advertised to my SP,
> > pinging google.com resolved, but Only via IPv6.
> > odd this Particular router only listen and responds to google
Hi,
If I set up a CSS that uses "normal services" and a "primarySorryServer", is it
possible to make the CSS not return to it's normal services as soon as they
change from Down to Alive, but to have a delay of say 5 minutes and stay on the
"primarySorryServer" for that additional amount of time
Hi,
If I set up a CSS that uses "advanced-balance cookieurl" in a content that is
going to a service that uses keepalive, is it possible to make it work as
follows:
"Normal service" is indicated as healthy - all traffic goes to "normal service"
"Normal service" is indicated as struggling - cook
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 17/08/12 15:29, John Neiberger wrote:
>
>> > Can you be more specific here? >Where would you shape?
>>
>> I was wondering if an outbound shaping policy on the 1g links would
>> smooth out the peaks of those bursts prior to them hitting the
On 17/08/12 15:29, John Neiberger wrote:
> Can you be more specific here? >Where would you shape?
I was wondering if an outbound shaping policy on the 1g links would
smooth out the peaks of those bursts prior to them hitting the small
hardware queue. I'm just kind of thinking out loud.
Not r
On Aug 17, 2012 7:57 AM, "Phil Mayers" wrote:
>
> On 17/08/12 14:48, John Neiberger wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I suspected that was the case or it would have been mentioned
>> before. We have played around with different queuing parameters and
>> queue depths, but I'm trying to find some other potential
On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Chris Lane wrote:
> to follow up, once i added v6 to the router and advertised to my SP,
> pinging google.com resolved, but Only via IPv6.
> odd this Particular router only listen and responds to google via v6.. Did
> they change something?
>
> no other site does th
Google is one of the few who enabled entries for their main website
pages on the v6 go live day a few months back...
That is why it's doing it. There are some other sites that will be
affected too for you.
Hth.
On Aug 17, 2012 8:19 AM, "Chris Lane" wrote:
> to follow up, once i added v6
On 17/08/12 14:48, John Neiberger wrote:
Thanks, I suspected that was the case or it would have been mentioned
before. We have played around with different queuing parameters and
queue depths, but I'm trying to find some other potential solutions.
Would a shaping service policy work for this? I'
Thanks, I suspected that was the case or it would have been mentioned
before. We have played around with different queuing parameters and queue
depths, but I'm trying to find some other potential solutions.
Would a shaping service policy work for this? I'm wondering what the impact
would be on mic
Fix is specifically in :
Reload SMU, SMU Pack1 for ASR9k NP, PRM and DRV fixes, Mandatory SMU
asr9k-p-4.2.1.CSCua76130.tar
But yes, that tarball should have it as well.
Tnx
Chris
On 08/17/2012 04:48 AM, tim wrote:
On 05.07.2012 12:45 AM, Chris Griffin wrote:
There was actually a bug that cau
to follow up, once i added v6 to the router and advertised to my SP,
pinging google.com resolved, but Only via IPv6.
odd this Particular router only listen and responds to google via v6.. Did
they change something?
no other site does this that i can see.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Charles S
On 05.07.2012 12:45 AM, Chris Griffin wrote:
> There was actually a bug that caused this for many authentic Cisco CWDM
> SFPs. SMU coming for 4.2.1 sometime mid this month. May help your issue.
Don't known which SMU it is, but with the "4.2.1-Updated Tarball for
ASR9K Recommended SMU's" of 05-AU
On 08/17/2012 07:02 AM, John Neiberger wrote:
This has come up a few times recently. We continue to run into new
situations where we see lots of output queue drops on 6748 blades,
especially in cases where a 10g link is feeding a 1g link. We see OQDs
long before the interface approaches anything
As update for the list after some e-mails offlist:
On 06.08.2012 6:03 PM, Aaron wrote:
> I think the phy int can't be l2transport if you want the subordinate subints
> to be l2transport
>
> Is g0/0/0/0 l2transport ?
>
> Sh run int g0/0/0/0..lemme see it please
Strange IOS XR, you have t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
> Would this even do what we want?
It won't do anything.
'hold-queue' is only for software based forwarding platforms.
it would help if you had a burst of packets back-to-back going for software
forwarding, but if you have that happening, y
23 matches
Mail list logo
