Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6509 EOS/EOL

AFAIK, the maintenance agreement is tied to the chassis, not the module. Regards, Alexander Lim On 13 Sep, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote: Hello group, The EOS/EOL announcement for the WS-C6509 says that the last Date of Support is November 30, 2012:

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6509 EOS/EOL

Yes, that's why I'm worried with this. This issue doesn't apply to the service modules like the FWSM, ACE and so on because we need to pay the fees for them individually. I need to involve my Cisco Account Team to clarify after all what is the correct end-of-support date for the 6509. It's a big

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6509 EOS/EOL

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Antonio Soares wrote: Hello group, The EOS/EOL announcement for the WS-C6509 says that the last Date of Support is November 30, 2012: You already can't buy a new support contract on a 6509 chassis. Cisco apparently expects us to junk those and replace them with 6509E

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 6509 EOS/EOL

The last date for contract renewal was August 1st of this year. If you renewed for a 3 year contract, you may still be able to receive TAC support on the box (it shows up in CSCC therefore you can call in to create a case) but if there's any hardware problem with the line cards, supervisor(s) or

[c-nsp] Pruning VLANs off of a REP segment

I observed a glaring oversight this morning after migrating a chain of 3 ME3400s from STP to REP... We like consistency and cookie-cutter stuff, so we try to mirror configs as much as humanly possible across as many devices as possible. Along that same vain, we serve DHCP customers off of

Re: [c-nsp] Any experience with DMVPN on ASR1K?

Thanks Andrew! With 1.5k per hub do you mean the number of spokes? What IGP are you using in your DMVPN cloud? thanks -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Clark Sent: vrijdag 14 september 2012 18:26 To:

[c-nsp] BGP MD5 DDOS ?

Hi Folks, I remember reading / hearing that using a BGP password could cause a DDOS vulnerability with Cisco and other vendor devices. Any words of wisdom here ?? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] BGP MD5 DDOS ?

It came up 2 or 3 years ago I seem to remember. ACLs to verify the BGP endpoints are a good first line of defense. Cisco came up with a feature that seems to help as well, see below. Some people are for MD5, some feel it has no value...