[c-nsp] forced up/up on a fiber link

2012-10-22 Thread LM
Hi all, For copper ethernet port I know there is an option to force up/up with no keepalive But, what about a fiber link? I have here a 7606 with... Cisco 7600 Series SPA Interface Processor-400 Rev. 2.5 5-port Gigabit Ethernet Shared Port Adapter no keepalive command available under

Re: [c-nsp] forced up/up on a fiber link

2012-10-22 Thread Damian Holdcroft
Hi LM I wonder if copper ports take advantage of the loopback circuitry to fake a keepalive? Either way, I would imagine a fibre port would not play ball. It would be a potential hazard - a laser firing into air could damage some eyes. I haven't seen a fibre port report link-up without something

Re: [c-nsp] forced up/up on a fiber link

2012-10-22 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-10-22 22:29 +1100), Damian Holdcroft wrote: Either way, I would imagine a fibre port would not play ball. It would be a potential hazard - a laser firing into air could damage some eyes. I haven't seen a fibre port report link-up without something to participate. All

Re: [c-nsp] SSH from inside a VRF in 12.2SRE

2012-10-22 Thread Aled Morris
On 22 October 2012 02:19, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+cisco...@eintellego.netwrote: The /vrf switch exists in 12.2SRE for telnet, but not for SSH. Anyone know if there is a reason for this? It exists in 12.4 I think. Out of curiosity, does it support ip ssh source-interface x y/z? That will

Re: [c-nsp] forced up/up on a fiber link

2012-10-22 Thread Tóth András
Hi, The hw-module module x simulate link-up command will probably help you. It causes all ports on a specified module to be up/up. It might require service internal too. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6017/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080882963.html#wp1011675 Best regards,

Re: [c-nsp] forced up/up on a fiber link

2012-10-22 Thread Aaron
no keepalive? On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tóth András diosbej...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The hw-module module x simulate link-up command will probably help you. It causes all ports on a specified module to be up/up. It might require service internal too.

[c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

2012-10-22 Thread Evgeny Zhuravlev
Hello List! Now we are using Cisco 7201 routers to terminate ISG IPoE sessions (subscriber interface). For some sessions, we use Netflow activation through the radius (CoA). For the downstream subscriber traffic radius Netflow activation was realized by assigning the policy-map with the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

2012-10-22 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Evgeny Zhuravlev wrote: Are there any options to enable or disable NetFlow using RADIUS CoA for ISG subscriber interface sessions on the Cisco ASR1000 routers? Why not just leave it on all the time?

[c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

2012-10-22 Thread Журавлев Евгений Алексеевич
Hello List! Now we are using Cisco 7201 routers to terminate ISG IPoE sessions (subscriber interface). For some sessions, we use Netflow activation through the radius (CoA). For the downstream subscriber traffic radius Netflow activation was realized by assigning the policy-map with the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

2012-10-22 Thread Журавлев Евгений Алексеевич
Hi Roland! Are there any options to enable or disable NetFlow using RADIUS CoA for ISG subscriber interface sessions on the Cisco ASR1000 routers? Why not just leave it on all the time? Enabling of the NF on all interfaces leads to processing overhead at the router and the NF collector.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

2012-10-22 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Журавлев Евгений Алексеевич wrote: Enabling of the NF on all interfaces leads to processing overhead at the router Not on an ASR1000, or even a 7200 with a fairly recent NPE - this is a myth. and the NF collector. Are you just collecting raw flows with nfdump