Thanks Nick - Hope I dont get one fail in a remote DC and have to request
remote hands remove/install a new SFP...
Ill try the small screwdriver on Monday.
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:06:08 +
> From: n...@foobar.org
> To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject
On 06/03/2013 23:28, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> As per the subject - I have two SFP-GE-T's that I cannot remove from a
> 4500-X (If I install the same SFP's into an ASR, they can be removed
> easily)
>
> Any suggestions on how to remove them from the 4500-X?
I would use a flat-head mini-screwdriver (
Kevin,
> We saw the same crash two weeks or so ago and are running
> (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.2(4)S1 on
> RSP720-3CXL's. Sure it's not related, but It did happened while
> rancid was querying the router.
Thank you for responding. Cisco TAC did mention RANCID when reviewin
We saw the same crash two weeks or so ago and are running
(c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.2(4)S1 on RSP720-3CXL's.
Sure it's not related, but It did happened while rancid was querying the
router.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cis
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:11:16PM +0200, M K wrote:
> Hi all
> What smaller Cisco device that supports DHCP option 82
ip dhcp relay information option
To enable the system to insert a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
relay agent information option in forwarded BOOTREQUEST messages to a
Hey guys. I having a little trouble. It appears that the SF302 does port
mirror a little differently. I can only find documentation on how to do it
through the web interface. That is not an option at the moment. Does anyone
have an example to set it up from the CLI?
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does software
> forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason for punts is?
Ahh... anybody else notice that MAC move notification by default isn't
enabled on a Sup720? :-D
Hi,
>
> On 03/08/2013 07:46 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that
> does software
> > forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason
> for punts is?
>
> An excellent question. In the past, TAC have found stuff like
> this with ELAM c
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 09:04 +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > CPU utilization for five seconds: 64%/47%; one minute: 53%; five minutes:
> > 54%
> > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> > 272 3323138876185619556
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 09:08 +, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 07:46 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does software
> > forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason for punts is?
>
> An excellent question. In the past, TAC hav
On 03/08/2013 07:46 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does software
forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason for punts is?
An excellent question. In the past, TAC have found stuff like this with
ELAM captures, but it's never been
On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> CPU utilization for five seconds: 64%/47%; one minute: 53%; five minutes: 54%
> PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> 272 33231388761856195560 1790 5.83% 4.97% 4.44% 0 IP Input
Is it possible that
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 07:59 +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does
> > software forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason
> > for punts is?
>
> sh fm sum and proc c sort might
On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does software
> forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason for punts is?
sh fm sum and proc c sort might provide some clues.
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
