Re: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

2013-03-25 Thread Tony
Hi Robert, You need a "router port" (eg. ES20+, SIP/SPA) to do that kind of thing, not a "switch port" (eg. 65xx, 67xx). I always liken the switch linecards to be about the same as shoving a c3750 (or perhaps 4500) as a card into the 6500/7600 chassis. There is a definite limitation to the amo

[c-nsp] nexus 7k logging with ACL name ?

2013-03-25 Thread Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
nexus 7k 6.1.2 Is there any way to show in log message, when you have and ACL with LOG option, the actual name of the ACL? Thanks for any help. Jeff Fitzwater OIT Network Systems Princeton University ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.neth

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Olivier CALVANO wrote: > i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two card: > > *Mar 25 17:20:06.375: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 2 DFC incompatible > with Supervisor DFC. Power denied > *Mar 25 17:20:09.299: %C6KENV-2-DFCMI

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Matthew Huff
Yes, except for the ones that aren't :) The 6708 has the DFC integrated and isn't upgradable. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/hardware/Module_Installation/Mod_Install_Guide/0adtrcrd.html There are listed as upgradeable with the WS-F6K-DFC4-A / WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL .WS-X6724

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 25/03/13 17:52, Dan Brisson wrote: Is it correct that DFC4s are field upgradeable? I believe all DFC3 linecards can be upgraded to DFC4 *except* for the 6708, which cannot be upgraded. Note that 6748 and 6716 need slightly different DFC4 - there's an -E and -A, same price, but I can't re

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 25/03/13 17:56, Jeff Kell wrote: You can't do a CFC on a WS-X6716-10GE, can you? No. So, on this card you must upgrade to a DFC4 (can't remember whether it's -E or -A for the 6716). Note also that 6708 cannot be upgraded, so cannot be used with Sup2T. _

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > Is it correct that DFC4s are field upgradeable? depends on the card. cisco document where your money will be spent. alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puc

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Jeff Kell
You can't do a CFC on a WS-X6716-10GE, can you? Jeff On 3/25/2013 1:46 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 25/03/13 17:35, Olivier CALVANO wrote: >> Hi >> >> i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two >> card: >> >> *Mar 25 17:20:06.375: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 2 DFC incom

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Dan Brisson
Is it correct that DFC4s are field upgradeable? -dan Sent from a mobile phone with a tiny keyboard On Mar 25, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 25/03/13 17:35, Olivier CALVANO wrote: >> Hi >> >> i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two card: >> >> *Mar 25

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 25/03/13 17:35, Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two card: *Mar 25 17:20:06.375: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 2 DFC incompatible with Supervisor DFC. Power denied *Mar 25 17:20:09.299: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 3 DFC incompatibl

[c-nsp] VS-S2T-10G card with WS-X6748-SFP Card => DFC Problems

2013-03-25 Thread Olivier CALVANO
Hi i have a Cisco 6504E with a VS-S2T-10G and a small problems with two card: *Mar 25 17:20:06.375: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 2 DFC incompatible with Supervisor DFC. Power denied *Mar 25 17:20:09.299: %C6KENV-2-DFCMISMATCH: Module 3 DFC incompatible with Supervisor DFC. Power denied Anyone

Re: [c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread Marco Nesler
You can use Flex Links marco 2013/3/25 M K > Hi I was wondering if I can avoid switching loops without turning on > spanning tree ?I have two connections between two switches and they are > configured as access in the same vlan , and i do not want to configure > spanning tree , how to avoid loo

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU utilization on sup720 with GRE

2013-03-25 Thread Jared Mauch
Also look at turning on mls mpls tunnel-recirc This will work around a hardware bug that could black hole traffic in some cases. Use this even without mpls. Jared Mauch On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Samir Abidali wrote: > Hi All > > Can you somebody help me in understanding whey GRE tunnel C

Re: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

2013-03-25 Thread Pete Lumbis
On the 6k I think EVC configuration can only be accomplishes on ES+ (maybe ES-20?) or with Sup2t http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15.1SY/config_guide/sup2T/ethernet_virtual_connection.html On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Robert Williams wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Many t

Re: [c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread cnsp
Get a special device for this kind of problem, for example www.knipex.com Products > Cable and Wire Rope Shears > Cable Shears 95 26 165 Cable Shears with opening spring EAN 4003773069980 > > Hi I was wondering if I can avoid switching loops without turning on > spanning tree ?I have two connec

Re: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

2013-03-25 Thread Robert Williams
Hi Adam, Many thanks for that, it reads like it would do exactly what we need, however the switch doesn't accept Ethernet encapsulation: (config-if)#service instance 10 ethernet (config-if-srv)#ethernet ? lmi Configure ether lmi parameters (config-if-srv)#? Ethernet EFP configuration commands

Re: [c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread Elmar K. Bins
gunner_...@live.com (M K) wrote: > Hi I was wondering if I can avoid switching loops without turning on spanning > tree ?I have two connections between two switches and they are configured as > access in the same vlan , and i do not want to configure spanning tree , how > to avoid loops ? Easy

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU utilization on sup720 with GRE

2013-03-25 Thread Pete Lumbis
The use of tunnel keys can also cause punted packets on 6k On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Samir Abidali wrote: > I am using Different source IP address, I will try user a loopback > interface as a change and see if that will work. > > Appreciate your help Simon > > Thank you > > Best Regards >

Re: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

2013-03-25 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi Robert, I believe you should be able to use the following config for the VLAN 10. interface Gi1/1 service instance 10 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 10 rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric bridge-domain 40 interface Vlan 40 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 check out the following

Re: [c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread Hari bamsha Sapkota
You can go for flex link feature on your switches. Hope this helps. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, M K wrote: > Hi I was wondering if I can avoid switching loops without turning on > spanning tree ?I have two connections between two switches and they are > configured as access in the same vl

Re: [c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread Andrew Miehs
Spanning tree is automatically enabled on the Cisco switches- you don't need to configure anything. Alternatively, you can use a port-channel but you would need to configure that. HP Procurve switches come with spanning tree disabled. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, M K wrote: > Hi I was wo

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU utilization on sup720 with GRE

2013-03-25 Thread Samir Abidali
I am using Different source IP address, I will try user a loopback interface as a change and see if that will work. Appreciate your help Simon Thank you Best Regards Samir Abid Ali Core Network Manager Gorannet ISP Mobile:07703-587-625 Office:053 5111 000 ext. 1032 -Original Message- F

[c-nsp] Switching Loops

2013-03-25 Thread M K
Hi I was wondering if I can avoid switching loops without turning on spanning tree ?I have two connections between two switches and they are configured as access in the same vlan , and i do not want to configure spanning tree , how to avoid loops ? Thanks