Hi Pshem,
We have seen the same issue with the 3800x
In our case we use the maximum allowed packet number
queue-limit 2457 packets
If I'm not mistaken, there are improvements coming to the default queue
sizes with the 15.3 train
George
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Pshem Kowalczyk
Actually, all IOS releases that support SLAs and IPv6 support ipv6 route
track.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Tim Warnock tim...@timoid.org wrote:
Afternoon,
Is there an IOS that supports ipv6 route track?
Thanks
-Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi,
after replacing one of our old vs-s720-3cxl and 6708-3cxl combo for a
new sup2t-xl and 6908-2txl I'm struggling with a really poor netflow
performance.
In fact, enhanced netflow capacity and capabilities were the major
reasons for upgrade.
On the old vs-s720-3cxl setup we have used
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:37:00PM +0100, Jiri Prochazka wrote:
after replacing one of our old vs-s720-3cxl and 6708-3cxl combo for a
new sup2t-xl and 6908-2txl I'm struggling with a really poor netflow
performance.
Ugh. I can't answer this - we have no Sup2T yet - but I would be very
Had a 6506-E running redundant Sup2T's perform a failover from ACTIVE to HOT
STANDBY yesterday with nothing showing in the logs right after the hourly
RANCID collection completed. Running
s2t54-advipservicesk9-mz.SPA.122-50.SY3.bin
Anyone seen this?
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
Hi Jiri,
We didn't have any issue so far, make sure you set a threshold for your
exporter with:
flow hardware export threshold value
Accordingly to Cisco doc:
Since the amount of NetFlow data that can be collected by a system has
increased dramatically with the Supervisor Engine 2T, it is
HiUsing PIM sparse-mode is
there a way, on the randevouz point, to see which ip address has sent
the register unicast packet to the radevouz point to register an
available mcast flow ? With
show ip mroute x.x.x.x I can’t see anything but the provider is
telling me it’s sending the flow and I
try to repeat in better format:
Hi
Using PIM sparse-mode is there a way, on the randevouz point, to see which ip
address has sent the register unicast
packet to the radevouz point to register an available mcast flow ?
With show ip mroute x.x.x.x I can’t see anything but the provider is
On 3/26/13 10:19 AM, Peter Kranz wrote:
Had a 6506-E running redundant Sup2T's perform a failover from ACTIVE to HOT
STANDBY yesterday with nothing showing in the logs right after the hourly
RANCID collection completed. Running
s2t54-advipservicesk9-mz.SPA.122-50.SY3.bin
Anyone seen this?
Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:53:47PM -0600, Brielle Bruns:
On 3/26/13 10:19 AM, Peter Kranz wrote:
Had a 6506-E running redundant Sup2T's perform a failover from ACTIVE to HOT
STANDBY yesterday with nothing showing in the logs right after the hourly
RANCID collection completed. Running
It happened as rancid logged out I believe.
Tammy
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2013, at 13:04, heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote:
Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:53:47PM -0600, Brielle Bruns:
On 3/26/13 10:19 AM, Peter Kranz wrote:
Had a 6506-E running redundant Sup2T's perform a failover from
Anyone doing HSRP v2 on a 3750G (IP Services) ? Bonus points if on a
VRF SVI ?
Jeff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
We're running 15.3 already. We got the buffers to 2MB per service, but
still see occasional tail drop.
kind regards
Pshem
On 27 March 2013 02:26, George Giannousopoulos ggian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pshem,
We have seen the same issue with the 3800x
In our case we use the maximum allowed
On 26/03/2013 20:59, Jeff Kell wrote:
Anyone doing HSRP v2 on a 3750G (IP Services) ? Bonus points if on a
VRF SVI ?
My understanding is platform limitations make this difficult, in
particular I think you can only have 1 HSRP group per SVI, so can't do
IPv4 at the same time.
IIRC it was
Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:24:52PM -0600, Tammy A Wisdom:
It happened as rancid logged out I believe.
Assuming that rancid is not complaining about the collection failing, you
are probably correct. If you use AAA accounting or command authorization,
you might try disabling that. Its really the
Hi,
...just wondering why its doing 'write term' at the endthat
used to cause issues a while back on the old sup2's
alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
If the question is whether it's supported, then yes. Support for HSRP
Version 2 (HSRPv2) is available from 12.2(46)SE and later.
VRF-aware HSRP support is available from 12.2(40)SE and later. HSRPv6 in
IPBase is from 12.2(50)SE.
From the config guide:
Routers in an HSRP group can be any router
Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:35:28PM +, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk:
Hi,
...just wondering why its doing 'write term' at the endthat
used to cause issues a while back on the old sup2's
One size fits all - though antiquities, not all IOS or models have show
running.
That means the supervisor have crashed, reloaded and became the standby.
You should look for crashinfo files on the bootflash: of the supervisor
which have crashed (now standby). Looking into those crashinfo files you
might either find some clue about the reason, or you can upload it to the
Output
On 26-Mar-13 18:33 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
Ugh. I can't answer this - we have no Sup2T yet - but I would be very
much interested in whether you can get this solved. We're currently
planning our next gen hardware, and it will either be ASR9001 or Sup2T -
and we're leaning towards Sup2T
Hi Jiri,
You could try with less collect parameters. I'd remove them and increase
gradually to find out which one causes the biggest performance decrease.
You might try the following netflow full-flow config:
flow record FULL
match ipv4 source address
match ipv4 destination address
match
Yea I don't recall if we did that or not. We changed to juniper afterwards :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2013, at 15:29, heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote:
Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:24:52PM -0600, Tammy A Wisdom:
It happened as rancid logged out I believe.
Assuming that rancid is not
On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Tammy A Wisdom tammy-li...@wiztech.biz wrote:
Yea I don't recall if we did that or not. We changed to juniper afterwards :)
I've tried for years to get Cisco to run RANCID against their equipment in the
lab before they ship software. They have been uninterested.
23 matches
Mail list logo
