[c-nsp] ES20+ L3 subinterface or service instance ?

Hi, We are starting to migrate some connections from SIP400/SPA to ES20+ cards on our 7609's (sup720 w/ SRD4) The basic configuration we would have on an existing SPA interface would look like something this: interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1.512  encapsulation dot1Q 512  ip vrf forwarding abc  

Re: [c-nsp] ES20+ L3 subinterface or service instance ?

On (2013-04-21 03:11 -0700), Tony wrote: Hi, We are starting to migrate some connections from SIP400/SPA to ES20+ cards on our 7609's (sup720 w/ SRD4) interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1.512  service-policy output shape_to_carrier_tail_speed You should definitely use subinterfaces when you

Re: [c-nsp] data center/mpls/vpls

On 16/04/13 15:44, Aaron wrote: Thanks for the warning on the 9000v We have thought about using it but aren't going to for the DC deployment. (it doesn't have the (11) 10gig interfaces we need to begin with) It always seemed attractive that it was advertised as a linecard in an asr9k with all

[c-nsp] Sup2T rate limit

Hi folks, From what I've been reading, I could do the following to rate limit a vlan to 100M class-map match-all rate match any policy-map rate class rate police 1 3200 conform transmit exceed drop int vlan99 service-policy input rate But show policy-map interface vlan99 detail doesn't

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

All PEs within a given VPLS are assigned a unique VPLS Edge device ID (VE ID). Nick is right about BGP NLRI, VPLS BGP NLRI (RFC 4761) AFI = 25 (L2VPN) SAFI = 65 (VPLS) VE ID VE Block Offset (VBO) VE Block Size (VBS) Label Base (LB) Best Regards,