Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

2013-04-25 Thread Lee Starnes
Hi Andrew, We have not tried any multimode xfp's. While the documentation shows a table with only single mode optics, at the end of the document, it lists an XFP-10G-MM-SR in the ordering info table. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Jones wrote: > Whilst we are talking about SPA-110GE c

Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

2013-04-25 Thread Edward Salonia
Multimode?? No. Singlemode LR/ZR/ER XFPs - Ed -Original Message- From: Andrew Jones Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:09:35 To: e...@edgeoc.net; Lee Starnes Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp Subject: RE: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 Whilst we are talking about SPA-110G

Re: [c-nsp] ipsla - latency - related to cellular backhaul

2013-04-25 Thread Tony
Hi, > > From: Aaron > >Tac says that this drop and the latency seen using various ipsla pings is >expected since all pings are treated less than everything else and could be >getting policed by LPTS (I don't know what LPTS is) > Google tells me that LPTS = Loca

Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

2013-04-25 Thread Andrew Jones
Whilst we are talking about SPA-110GE cards, has anyone got these to work with a multimode sr xfp? Andrew Jones -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Edward Salonia Sent: Friday, 26 April 2013 1:25 AM To: Lee Starnes Cc: cisco-nsp@puc

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X vs ASR9001

2013-04-25 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 25/04/2013 22:03, Drew Weaver wrote: > We love the ASR9001 too and for the price there is nothing else like it. =) the mx80 preceded it by a couple of years. The fact that the mx80 sold like hotcakes forced cisco into producing the asr9001, as far as I could tell. But yes, it's a great router

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

2013-04-25 Thread Aaron
Thanks Nick, Yeah I recall using no rd and no route targets with a vpls w/bd ad and ldp sig must have all worked with some automagic rd and rt thingy's Also my version of me3600 ios doesn't have bgp signaling possible, only ldp. I think a previous poster (waris maybe) mentioned that 15.3(2)S

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X vs ASR9001

2013-04-25 Thread Drew Weaver
We love the ASR9001 too and for the price there is nothing else like it. =) -Drew -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nikolay Shopik Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:41 PM To: Cisco Network Service Providers Subject: [c-nsp] ASR100

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

2013-04-25 Thread Nick Ryce
Had a call with cisco tac and they managed to get it working by removing the RD. No idea why this resolved it. Now to try and get it to working with a juniper PE. Nick -- Nick Ryce Fluency Communications Ltd. e. n...@fluency.net.uk w. http://fluency.net.uk/ t. 0845 874 7000 On 16/04/2013

[c-nsp] ipsla - latency - related to cellular backhaul

2013-04-25 Thread Aaron
I have seen some latency (measured using ipsla icmp/udp/mpls pw pings) beyond my agreements with some of our cellular backhaul customers.. We are concerned that if/when they ask to see their sla measurements for their cell towers that we won't be looking very good Cisco Tac is telling me th

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2T rate limit

2013-04-25 Thread Luan Nguyen
Hi Mack, Thanks for the suggestion. It's the VLAN for the ACE module - so nowhere to put that command. Regards, -Luan On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Mack McBride wrote: > Did you use the 'mls qos vlan-based' command? > > Mack > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-n

Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

2013-04-25 Thread Edward Salonia
Sure. Future-proofing, when capable, is a good idea. -Original Message- From: Lee Starnes Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:53:03 To: Cc: cisco-nsp; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 Hi Ed, So there should be no issue if they are used for wha

Re: [c-nsp] me3600X-CX 15.2(4)S2 GigE port-channel to ASR9k - isis blind

2013-04-25 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Aah yes your right I totally forgot about that. adam From: Pete Lumbis [mailto:alum...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:48 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600X-CX 15.2(4)S2 GigE port-channel to ASR9k - isis blind With regards to the I

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 hanging after rommon starts loading IOS

2013-04-25 Thread Brielle Bruns
On 4/24/13 2:31 PM, Paul wrote: For compact flash cards you need to put them in a PC, and remove the partition table (or format it FAT16). Once the partition table is completely removed , format it in your supervisor and it will work every time. The issue is that most flash cards come with the pa

Re: [c-nsp] me3600X-CX 15.2(4)S2 GigE port-channel to ASR9k - isis blind

2013-04-25 Thread Pete Lumbis
With regards to the IIH padding, disabling padding only disables the padding after a neighbor is discovered. You need to tack on the "always" keyword to disable all padding. This may be hidden as it was only recently exposed (but it's been there for a long time). On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:01 AM

[c-nsp] ME3600X upgrade and multicast questions

2013-04-25 Thread Mike Poublon
First some background: We've been running two ME3600X's (Version 12.2(52)EY3 - ancient I know) in our network at opposite ends of a metro Ethernet circuit to allow us to remap the provider's handoff VLAN tags to our own (when needed). We use one of the VLANs as a connection directly between tw

Re: [c-nsp] Hide Configuration

2013-04-25 Thread CCIE Ninja
I guess you could use role based CLI?  I'm not sure would that achieve exactly what you want and it would probably be a little messy :-) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps5318/products_configuration_example09186a0080993ff0.shtml From: M K To:

[c-nsp] Hide Configuration

2013-04-25 Thread M K
HiCan I hide part of the running configuration from a specific user ?For example , I have event manager script configured and I want to hide this from certain users BR, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.ne

[c-nsp] me3600X-CX 15.2(4)S2 GigE port-channel to ASR9k - isis blind

2013-04-25 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi folks, I got unidirectional link for CLNS on a routed port-channel between me3600x-cx and ASR9k. There's only one GigE in the bundle on both ends. ASR9k sees IIHs in and out however on CX I do not see IIHs from ASR9k. Also I have noticed that CX pads the IIH to the full MTU even though the int

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X vs ASR9001

2013-04-25 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 24/04/2013 23:11, Dan Brisson wrote: > It only samples though, if I remember correctly. You can configure 1:1, > but you run the risk of overrunning it. the asr9001 can cache up to 1m netflow entries, which is the same as larger asr9k units and also the same as the sup2txl. If you're shipping

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X vs ASR9001

2013-04-25 Thread Nikolay Shopik
I understand its CPU not that fast as XEON on ASR1K-RP2, but just wondering how fast it is for bgp full view convergence? On 4/25/13 1:26 AM, LavoJM wrote: Anyway, the 9k is a powerhouse and we love them. Highly recommended. ___ cisco-nsp mailing lis