Yes Mark, you are absolutely right. With the advent of NG-MVPN we can
finally bye bye the PIM in our backbones.
Though now with MPLS all the way to access/pre-aggregation layer I'd like to
see MVPN support there as well, namely ME3600x/-cx/3800x platforms.
adam
-Original Message-
From:
Hello Tin,
We are using FP-40 instead of the MSC, and it is working fine with no bad
experience at all, we are not affected by its limitations as we did not
need the extra features found in the MSC, so i encourage you to go for it
if it is sufficient for your needs.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:13
I can vouch for the asr9k in regards too performance. But the software
still is not as stable as you might want.
On May 2, 2013 9:52 AM, gustav.ulan...@steria.se wrote:
Hello Simon.
We are using asr1k for peering purposes and Sup2T in the core. We also
have some sup 720 as PE routers.
We find
On Sunday, May 05, 2013 01:43:44 PM Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Yes Mark, you are absolutely right. With the advent of
NG-MVPN we can finally bye bye the PIM in our backbones.
Though now with MPLS all the way to
access/pre-aggregation layer I'd like to see MVPN
support there as well, namely
On Sunday, May 05, 2013 04:08:55 PM Abdelfattah Ghattas
wrote:
We are using FP-40 instead of the MSC, and it is working
fine with no bad experience at all, we are not affected
by its limitations as we did not need the extra features
found in the MSC, so i encourage you to go for it if it
is
Jeroen van Ingen writes:
Our university upgraded from Cat6k/Sup720-3B to Cat6k/Sup2TXL a while
ago. Recently a few researchers who use our NetFlow data noticed that
the NetFlow exports sometimes contain strange values: there are flow
records with a negative duration (flow end before flow start
