Re,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:21:00PM -0400, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> > According to my "research" so far, the ASR1k does use TCAM but *not*
> > for the actual FIB. It's used for ACLs and QoS stuff, though.
>
> You are 100% correct. TCAM for features, QFP memory for FIB.
Fits my observation that I'
Hi,
My major concern is about the IOS difference , should I find a way to check
what is the IOS on the new Supervisor or this will not make difference , I read
the successful stories in Cisco websites but here I am asking people who really
did that on live Switchs.
Br.
BEN HAMMADI Kayssa
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote:
I have a 6509 with a standalone Sup720 and I am preparing to add a
redundant one, I don't know the software on the new Supervisor and my
final goal is to make both work on SSO mode. Can someone propose a
procedure with happy e
I got
300Mb synchronous throughput on the 2951 @ 512byte frames with packet
marking enabled (50% CPU)
140Mb synchronous @ 214byte frames with packet marking enabled (50% CPU)
45Mb synchronous @ 214byte frames with packet marking and NAT enabled (50%
CPU)
20Mb synchronous @ 214byte frames with pack
Dears
I have a 6509 with a standalone Sup720 and I am preparing to add a redundant
one, I don't know the software on the new Supervisor and my final goal is to
make both work on SSO mode. Can someone propose a procedure with happy end :) ?
Br.
BEN HAMMADI Kayssar
NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORK
W dniu 2013-05-28 15:55, Ryan West pisze:
interface vfc2
bind interface Ethernet1/25
switchport trunk allowed vsan 11
no shutdown
i have:
interface vfc2
bind interface Ethernet1/25
switchport trunk allowed vsan 11
no shutdown
interface vfc26
bind interface Ethernet1/
> According to my "research" so far, the ASR1k does use TCAM but *not*
> for the actual FIB. It's used for ACLs and QoS stuff, though.
You are 100% correct. TCAM for features, QFP memory for FIB.
It would mean we utilize just 40% of the QFP DRAM for that kind of FIB and
> the box is apparently m
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:06:32PM -0400, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> Since this is hardware based* you'll also need to look at how the FIB fit
> down into TCAM with "show plat hard qfp act tcam resource-manager usage"
>
> *CPP is a network processor not an ASIC like 6k, but it does rely on
> similar TCA
Hello,
I have a strange problem with l2tp over ipsec.
I have a 2811 with AIM-VPN/EPII-PLUS running IOS 15.0(1)M9 configured as LNS.
ipsec protection is configured using regular crypto map on router interface
(not using l2tp security profile).
Very standard config. The only difference from example
On May 26, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> On 27/05/2013 10:37 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> Basically all the images go through EFT with almost no exceptions.
>> Problem most vendors have is getting good feedback from the sites
>> with that early code. Seen that for over a decade with ma
Hello Scott,
Where did you find that 2951 can do up to 300Mbps?
Per this document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10538/aag_c45_556315.pdf
The upper router of ISR2 line can do up to 350Mbps, and that's a 3945E.
I did attached a document, with specs for different lines ISR2
Since this is hardware based* you'll also need to look at how the FIB fit
down into TCAM with "show plat hard qfp act tcam resource-manager usage"
*CPP is a network processor not an ASIC like 6k, but it does rely on
similar TCAM
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Beck, Andre wrote:
> Re,
>
> On
Dear Jiri,
we have similar netflow issues with our Sup2T-XL upgrades from the Sup720-3CXL.
In general, all show platform flow commands are incredibly slow and tend to take
minutes. Yes, I have waited longer than 10 minutes for certain show commands
to complete, which were almost instant on the sup
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
Scott
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Calin C. wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> Where did you find that 2951 can do up to 300Mbps?
>
> Per this document:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/
interface vfc2
bind interface Ethernet1/25
switchport trunk allowed vsan 11
no shutdown
-Original Message-
From: Piotr [mailto:piotr.1...@interia.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:29 AM
To: Ryan West
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nexus 5500 + fcoe + citrix ven
W dniu 2013-05-28 14:41, Ryan West pisze:
With 5500 it is necessary.
I added but still without success.. :(
new storage -> hardware hba -> probing for lun - no LUNs were found..
class-map type qos class-fcoe
class-map type queuing class-fcoe
match qos-group 1
class-map type queuing class-al
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse any horrible misspellings.
On May 27, 2013, at 8:36, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Has anyone encountered ISIS/CLNS MTU issues between ASR1k and ASR9k please?
>
> sh isis int / sh clns int
> - shows MTU: 9177 on both ends.
>
> debug isis adj-pa
With 5500 it is necessary.
Sent from handheld.
On May 28, 2013, at 8:28 AM, "Piotr" wrote:
> W dniu 2013-05-28 14:12, Ryan West pisze:
>> Did you create the necessary FCoE QoS policy?
> It's necessary in almost default setup ? i read in cisco docs that is
> optional..
_
W dniu 2013-05-28 14:12, Ryan West pisze:
Did you create the necessary FCoE QoS policy?
It's necessary in almost default setup ? i read in cisco docs that is
optional..
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mai
You are not fully logged into the fabric. Did you create the necessary FCoE
QoS policy?
Sent from handheld.
On May 28, 2013, at 8:06 AM, "Piotr" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new in nexus world, i just test some switches and i have problem:
>
> There is one switch 5548 with version 6.0(2)N1(2a). I
Hi,
I'm new in nexus world, i just test some switches and i have problem:
There is one switch 5548 with version 6.0(2)N1(2a). I try to make fcoe
conenction between xenserver 6.1 (port 1/25) and linux fcoe target (
centos, port 1/26).
In both servers i have card: Cisco Systems Inc VIC FCoE HB
Hi,
I have Nexus 5000.
system: version 5.2(1)N1(4)
I want to prevent dhcp_snoop logs from logging into logfile.
configured:
logging level dhcp_snoop 6
logging logfile messages 5 size 2097152
but I still got dhcp_snoop logs
2013 May 20 12:53:04 *%DHCP_SNOOP-5-DHCPHOSTADD
Re,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:59:03AM +0200, Beck, Andre wrote:
>
> When my 1002-X box with 16GB hits the lab, before anything else, I'll set
> it up to push BGP tables into it using bgpsimple (I also tried exabgp but
> it gets slow as molasses as soon as you try to push some 100k prefixes)
> an
On (2013-05-28 08:41 +1200), Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> MTU and 9097 as CLNS MTU (calculated by XR). On other platforms (xe
> and classic ios) we apply interface MTU of 9100 with "clns mtu 9083".
If you have to set CLNS MTU, then your physical MTU is not matching, some
might say a misconfig, but no
Hi Ahmed,
> I am planning to deploy Global VPN ( Multi-VRF / NNI ), but the concept is
> not clear for me.
>
> I have active a new link with my UP Link and configure it as sub-interface.
>
> Now i am going to connect one customer of mine with destination in UP Link
> network as VPN.
Just to be
25 matches
Mail list logo
