Hello.
Do you have a corresponding entry in the mpls forwarding database for the
next hop address?
Bästa hälsningar / Best regards,
Gustav Uhlander
Communication Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 622 42 15
Fax: +46 8 622 42 23
Hi Gustav,
Yep, as below:-
sw1.sco-edi-NEW#show mpls for 46.226.0.12 detail
Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
Label Label or Tunnel Id Switched interface
None 306496 46.226.0.12/32 0 Tu1point2point
What version of code are you running. There is a bug in DHCP after 4.1. I
have been working with Cisco on this and they finally acknowledged it is a
bug. We have no date for a patch yet.
We are using ASR9010 with 4.2.1 software.
I cannot get any cpe routers to pull IP addresses, but if I just
On Fri Jun 07, 2013 at 06:56:31AM -0500, Bradley Williamson wrote:
What version of code are you running. There is a bug in DHCP after 4.1. I
have been working with Cisco on this and they finally acknowledged it is a
bug. We have no date for a patch yet.
I'm running 4.3.1 on ASR9001. What's
On Friday, January 11, 2013 09:07:47 PM Gert Doering wrote:
All these IOS versions are ancient.
12.4(latest)-with-no-letters, or 15.0(latest)M would be
my recommendation.
12.2SR is still maintained on the 7200-VXR platform.
As of March 2013, 12.2(33)SRE8 was released. Fair point,
there
Additional services aside for the moment (qos, load balancing, etc) from
a layer 2 switching/bridging and layer 3 routing perspective, is there
something that one does that the other won't do ? trying to understand why
cisco would make a way to accomplish l2 and l3 using two different
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 05:58:12 PM Nick Hilliard
wrote:
I don't get why people shouldn't be able to ping each
other / etc. Isn't this traffic functionally equivalent
to any other Internet traffic? What's different about
it?
GPON implementations standardize this already, i.e., users
I think the same can be said for dslams
Mac-forced-forwarding might have something to do with this.
Config'ing a GPON (OLT) for unsecure mode (what calix calls it in their C7
olt/gpon) or TLS I think forego's the L2 blocking you mentioned
Isn't this what private vlans accomplishes in cisco
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday, January 11, 2013 09:07:47 PM Gert Doering wrote:
All these IOS versions are ancient.
12.4(latest)-with-no-letters, or 15.0(latest)M would be
my recommendation.
12.2SR is still maintained on the 7200-VXR
Hello Friends,
I have a Cisco SW ( 3560 ) with one Trunk link to my router ( 7606 ), Trunk
link is fully utilized so i need to add 2nd Trunk.
Shall all move some customers from old trunk to 2nd one and create a new
subterface for them ?
I am think if i can create bundle and add subinterfaces
Depending on the hashing algoritm, it is still possible for one link to run
hotter than the other in a bundle.
Just like it is possible for the right mix of customers to run one link
hotter than the other.
Using a second trunk means that most customers will not experience any
interruption, only
11 matches
Mail list logo
