Hi Team,
I have a requirement in such a way that there are two HUB's, one in Newyork
and other in LOS Angeles. The spoke locations will access the HUB location
whichever is closer geographically and the other acts as the backup for
that particular site.
If both the HUB's injects default route int
Hi Nick,
What do you think about ..
ASR1001-2XOC3POS with 1 unit of SPA-2XT3/E3
*Best Regards,**
**
Dipak Timsina
Dristi Tech Pvt. Ltd.
**Pulchowk | Lalitpur | Nepal
M: +977 9801011407 | T: +977 1 5552070
www.dristi.com.np*
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
...which is indeed the case...
achatz$ snmpwalk -v2c -c xxx router3 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.2
ip.31.3.1.6.2.68 = Counter64: 40795287767
ip.31.3.1.6.2.69 = Counter64: 1638113009435
This OID tree appears to be in NX-OS 6.1 on the Nexus 7Ks as w
...which is indeed the case...
achatz$ snmpwalk -v2c -c xxx router3 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.2
ip.31.3.1.6.2.68 = Counter64: 40795287767
ip.31.3.1.6.2.69 = Counter64: 1638113009435
achatz$ snmpwalk -v2c -c xxx router3 ifdescr | grep "6[89]"
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.68 = Bundle-Ether1
in
Something must have changed in the latest releases...
* router1 *
achatz$ snmpwalk -v2c -c xxx router1 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.2
ip.31.3.1.6.2.11 = Counter64: 5573037
ip.31.3.1.6.2.12 = Counter64: 5323016
ip.31.3.1.6.2.16 = Counter64: 197084118
ip.31.3.1.6.2.17 = Counter64: 317831472457
ip.31.3.1
On 22/07/2013 20:44, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> We have been using the following on ASR9k:
>
> object name oid
> ipIfStatsHCInOctets for IPv4 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.1
> ipIfStatsHCInOctets for IPv6 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.2
> ipIfStatsHCOutOctets for IPv4 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.33.1
This is done per default, on Cisco gear, in 3600s intervals.
You can do it manually aswell:
#mpls traffic-eng reoptimize ?
Tunnel Tunnel interface
#
Fredrik
On 22 July 2013 15:48, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
> Though I have no actual experience
>
> I asked the same question at cisco live.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 08:15:17 AM Mattias Gyllenvarg
> wrote:
>
> > Also, not only is there no redundant RSP it is not
> > replaceable either.
>
> The same can be said of the MX80, a competitor the ASR9001
> is squarely aimed at (albeit,
Hi Tassos,
Thanks very much for that, can I ask what version you are running and on which
specific hardware platform?
I found those OIDs in my Googling but I have no results for those when walking
them.
Within the tree: 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.X I have X = 3,5,30,32,34,36,38,40
But nothing
On Monday, July 22, 2013 04:23:31 AM Stephen Fulton wrote:
> I'll add my +1 to Mark's suggestions, and request more
> 10GE ports. We're receiving more requests for 10GE
> (mostly sub-rate, some line-rate) from our customers and
> offers from our carrier suppliers for the same. The
> 3600X-24CX fit
We have been using the following on ASR9k:
object name oid
ipIfStatsHCInOctets for IPv41.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.1
ipIfStatsHCInOctets for IPv61.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.6.2
ipIfStatsHCOutOctets for IPv4 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.33.1
ipIfStatsHCOutOctets for IPv6 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.33.2
Acc
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 11:29:01 PM Waris Sagheer (waris)
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
Hello Waris.
> - 48 gig port switch requirement, I suppose you also need
> 4x10Gig uplink along with 48 Gig port, correct?
Yes, we'd need at least 4x 10Gbps uplink SPF+ ports for a
switch that came with 48x Gig-E por
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:34:40PM -0700, quinn snyder wrote:
> i think you'll being to see futher enhancements to the platforms
> (c6k, nexus) that will start to draw clear lines between the
> positioning or 'general use case'. catalyst will continue to be
> the campus platform, while nexus w
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Yeah, licenses are a complete pain in the ass. I recently received an
> email license survey from Cisco to which the following reply was issued:
[..]
Nice reply.
We do not even get asked about such things anymore. Maybe they
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 05:17:30PM -0500, chris stand wrote:
> If you are layer 2 only ... look at the 2960X ... with/without POE.
>
> You can put 8 in a stack, make the 2 top devices 10 Gb uplinks - or all of
> them it you wish
>
> Limited L3 capabilities and limited netflow ... but a really good
Thus spake Nick Hilliard (n...@foobar.org) on Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:51:59PM
+0100:
> >
> > I would appreciate if you could register a single opinion:
> >
> > "Licenses suck. Please stop forcing them on us or we will buy even more
> > kit from other vendors".
>
> I doubt that the reply will b
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 22/07/2013 16:45, Robert Williams wrote:
So I need to find the 64bit version of the counters at 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.X
you need IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets / IF-MIB::ifHCOutOctets
That will give you the counter for all octets on that interface. If you
On 22-Jul-13 12:18 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>
> (Also, why is it taking >30 seconds to boot NO I DO NOT WANT DUAL SUP)
Dual sup will not always help you. *cough* Reload SMU *cough*
Dumitru
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
Hi Nick,
Thanks - unfortunately those are interface counters (i.e. v4+v6 octets
totalled) I need the IPv6 ones which are listed separately by the 'accounting'
feature at the OID I mentioned, just in 32 bit format. I need the 64 bit
versions of the accounting / ipv6 counters.
>> So I need to fi
Hi all,
Do you have command for auto reoptimize Traffic Engineering
by the router? When option 10 down and then up it can reoptimize by itself
to option 10.
Thank you very much
Mr. Nattawat Kaewmanee
___
cisco-nsp mailing list c
On 22/07/2013 16:45, Robert Williams wrote:
> So I need to find the 64bit version of the counters at 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.31.3.1.X
you need IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets / IF-MIB::ifHCOutOctets
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.ne
Hi All,
I’ve been going round in circles with this so maybe someone help me out?
I need to poll (snmp) the 64bit interface accounting counters for IPv6.
The command-line for the statistics is "show int te0/X/X/X accounting" - which
gives:
Protocol Pkts In Chars In Pk
On 22/07/2013 16:26, Fredrik Lönnman wrote:
> This is done per default, on Cisco gear, in 3600s intervals.
> You can do it manually aswell:
> #mpls traffic-eng reoptimize ?
> Tunnel Tunnel interface
>
You can tune it with:
mpls traffic-eng reoptimize events link-up
mpls traffic-eng reoptimi
On 22/07/2013 11:44, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> And then you look at the licensing options and find that you need to pay
> the same sum again to have the box actually do anything interesting :)
> Cisco/Juniper are copying Brocade with their licensing model for almost
> every feature.
Yeah, licenses
Though I have no actual experience
I asked the same question at cisco live. And yes, it is supposed to
reevaluate at certain intervals.
.
Best regards
Mattias Gyllenvarg
On Jul 22, 2013 12:15 PM, "PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do you have command for auto reoptim
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:18:26AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> (Also, why is it taking >30 seconds to boot NO I DO NOT WANT DUAL SUP)
Booting with dual SUPs takes longer :-)
("now running system diagnostics from standby supervisor", IIRC)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of W
On 07/22/2013 08:37 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:34:40PM -0700, quinn snyder wrote:
i think you'll being to see futher enhancements to the platforms
(c6k, nexus) that will start to draw clear lines between the
positioning or 'general use case'. catalyst will continue t
27 matches
Mail list logo
