This might be a question that should be targeted more towards a Cisco
AM/SE, but does anyone know the roadmap for IPv6 management support on
Cisco Wireless equipment? (I am most interested in IPv6 management for
autonomous access points.)
Documentation says:
"The support of IPv6 addresses for man
Please try using ipv4 unnumbered Loopback X under the subscriber interface.
Also add ipv4 point-to-point.
Under the dynamic template add ipv4 unnumbered Loopback X.
Your config should look like this:
inter loopback 10064
ipv4 100.64.248.129 255.255.255.192
interface Bundle-Ether1.3121
ipv4 po
Try using ipv4 unnumbered Loopback X under the subscriber interface. Also
add ipv4 point-to-point.
Under the dynamic template add ipv4 unnumbered Loopback X.
Your config should look like this:
inter loopback 10064
ipv4 100.64.248.129 255.255.255.192
interface Bundle-Ether1.3121
ipv4 point-to-
Nick,
modular ESP5 and integrated into 1002 have limitation of 512K, while
ASR1001 have 1M.
On 02/08/13 14:52, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 11:29, Olga wrote:
>> Correct me if i'm wrong
>
> It's more complicated than this on the asr1000 platform. See the archive
> for more details.
>
>
On 02/08/2013 11:29, Olga wrote:
> Correct me if i'm wrong
It's more complicated than this on the asr1000 platform. See the archive
for more details.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/c
Please, be advised, that ASR1002 with ESP5 holds maximum 512k ipv4
routes (or 128k IPv6 routes). If you want both ipv4 and ipv6 you have
to divide TCAM between the two, bearing in mind that ipv6 route is 4
times bigger then ipv4.So, if you have 10k ipv6 routes, for ipv4 you
have 472k left
Hi,
At first I'd check the output of 'show platform' cmd to see whether the FC
card is listed and its state is IOS XR RUN.
If you see both FC cards in there than it's just the LED display that got
broken.
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puc
Hi Darren,
Maybe it has something to do with the te-tunnel.
Do you get the same error without the te-tunnel? Or when you enable 'mpls
ip' on the te-tunnel please?
Is there a tunnel in the opposite direction as well?
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list c
In this case you will receive the routes with the next-hop of the hub CE. it
should be posible to use a route-map based on the next-hop and set the
local-prefence in each spoke based on the next-hop.
But, I would go the way of the community. It exists for this kind of
situations, is more stable
Hi listers,
I was wondering what software images people are running out there in the
wild on the ASR1000 series and what versions are recommended for stability.
The company I work for is about to receive some Cisco ASR1002 units with
ESP5.
The boxes will be used for border routing (3 full intern
10 matches
Mail list logo