Hello Ben,
It will load-balance between a path learned from a CE via eBGP as well as
the one learned from other PEs via MP-iBGP to which the CE has a redundant
connection to.
This was actually used prior to PIC to program both paths into the HW in
order to achieve fast convergence.
The downside
Hi folks,
Anyone seen previously established LDP targeted session to drop when PW is
configured -in order to renegotiate new capability with a peer.
Log msg includes: (AToM requested targeted session to existing non-AToM
peer).
adam
___
cisco-nsp
Hello,
We need to terminate a lot of double tagged vlans on ASR1K devices
(ASR1006/ESP20)to provide pppoe/dhcp connectivity.
Currently we work with sub-interfaces but as it is difficult to manage and
maintain thousands of sub-interfaces we are looking for a better way to
implement this.
In our
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, selamat pagi wrote:
yep, *ip multicast-routing* distributed is configured
you also have the correct sdm template setup on the switch ?
I assume you could not configure multicast routing otherwise.
Greetings
Christian
cheers, keti
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35
This got me yesterday! I configured an interface on my asr9000 with an
incorrect mask..the mask overlapped (encompassed) another pre-existing
interface . I guess IOS XR doesn't give you the warning like old IOS about
overlapping networks.look what it did! .it forced down the other
pre-existing
What version?
On 2013-08-14, at 9:22 AM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
This got me yesterday! I configured an interface on my asr9000 with an
incorrect mask..the mask overlapped (encompassed) another pre-existing
interface . I guess IOS XR doesn't give you the warning like old IOS about
On 08/12/2013 06:53 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
The questions comes down to whether remote console is sufficient or if
remote power is also required.
Hmm, the only thing I could find is to press ctrl-C three times in a row
at the RP rommon
ASR9006 - IOS XR 4.1.2
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:31 AM
To: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] overlapping ip onflict - IOS XR - forces interfaces
down
What version?
On
Oh yes,
I don't understand why ipv4 conflict-policy static and ipv6
conflict-policy static is not part of the default configuration
The default behavior makes no sense.
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Aaron
Sent:
We need to upgrade some ASR9Ks that have a lot of connected devices with
complex interrelationships and we have to do a lot of work to make sure all
the correct redundancy is in place prior to the upgrade. Since the router
takes so long to reload, I'd like to find a way to essentially simulate the
Been stuck for over an hour on the following:
On a ASR9k (4.1.2) acting as RR i 'm getting IPv4 next-hops instead of
IPv4-mapped ones, although the 6VPE router (ASR001, 15.1(3)S3) seems to set the
next-hop as it should.
PE (ASR001, 15.1(3)S3)
--
BGP(5): (base)
Oh nice,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.0/addr_ser
v/command/reference/b_ir40asrbook_chapter_01000.html#wp3657491863
So with static I wouldn't have had that problem yesterday. ? it says
static Keeps the existing interface running across new address
Copy/paste a bunch of null0 routes?
deny any acls on interfaces?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.comwrote:
We need to upgrade some ASR9Ks that have a lot of connected devices with
complex interrelationships and we have to do a lot of work to make sure all
I have wondered the same thing (on C6K/N7K.)
I have since given up wondering and stick to using ospf max-metric int
range shedload of interfaces shutdown
That atleast works whilst exposing us to the minimum amount of surprise
code features.
Given enough time, I'm sure SDN/OpenFluff will solve
null0 doesn't cause the NHRP to trigger IMHO this will be a disaster .
shut / no shut is the easiest but it doesn't simulate the whole part. real
test comes when the modules crash when reloading specially after couple of
years... :)
what if we copy a empty config ??? and rollback the config ?
This raises a good point.
Is the goal to simulate a black-hole that could be seen with an incorrect
adjacency, where control plane is healthy but data plane is broken, or is
the goal to simulate taking this device offline?
Do we care about carrier on the interfaces?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
Hello,
Excuse my ignorance, as this is my first time working with BGP outside of a
lab.
I am working on an ASR that is in use as a BGP peer to an ISP and also an
EIGRP neighbor to an internal network. I have setup this router for
NAT/PAT and all is working well for the internal private subnets.
In my case, the best result would be to simulate taking the entire device
offline, but I don't know if that's possible to reverse quickly. Taking the
interfaces down would be great. Really, the simplest thing to do is just
spend a minute to create a SMOP that shuts down the interfaces and be done
18 matches
Mail list logo
