Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 and BGP

2013-09-05 Thread CiscoNSP List
Thanks for the clarification - So RP1 will accept up to available ram in RIB (What happens when it exceeds available ram?), and then FIB will accept up to 1M prefixes(best path), which is currently ~460Kso on an RP1 you have an additional ~500k of prefixes(IPv4) that it will still accept?

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 and BGP

2013-09-05 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
You're mistaking FIB for RIB. RIB will take whatever fits in available memory, usually way more than 1M of IPv4 routes. FIB is limited to 1M prefixes, but only bestpaths land here, so with number of full feeds you'll usually anyway land at around 460k of prefixes. Try to search in archives for a

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 and BGP

2013-09-05 Thread Rati Berikaant Jokhadze
Routes are one , next-hops are different , i guess you wanted to know this :-) On 09/06/2013 09:51 AM, CiscoNSP List wrote: Another question on the ASR1000 :) RP1 supports 1M IPv4 routes i.e. ~2 full tables...If you bring on a third full table, will you see rib failure (memory) for all routes

[c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 and BGP

2013-09-05 Thread CiscoNSP List
Another question on the ASR1000 :) RP1 supports 1M IPv4 routes i.e. ~2 full tables...If you bring on a third full table, will you see rib failure (memory) for all routes that exceed 1M? (Assume yes?) How is the rib allocation calculated? if you added(peered) 4 full tables (sequentially, one

Re: [c-nsp] Question on ASR1000 over-subscription

2013-09-05 Thread CiscoNSP List
> > ASR1000 will drop traffic if you exceed the ESP's capacity. > > The router wont complain about multiple 10G SPA's, or rejected them (so *not* > like a 7200 with bandwidth points) > > Brad Thanks Brad.

Re: [c-nsp] Question on ASR1000 over-subscription

2013-09-05 Thread Brad Gould
ASR1000 will drop traffic if you exceed the ESP's capacity. The router wont complain about multiple 10G SPA's, or rejected them (so *not* like a 7200 with bandwidth points) Brad -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Se

[c-nsp] Question on ASR1000 over-subscription

2013-09-05 Thread CiscoNSP List
Hi, If you have RP1/ESP10/SIP10 in an ASR, and you install multiple 10G SPA's will the ASR complain(Reject the SPA's)? Or will it accept them, and if you exceed aggregate bandwidth of the ESP, you will simply see dropped traffic? Cheers. _

Re: [c-nsp] Disabling per-interface mls qos in 12.2SX, Possible? Was: CoPP and WRR

2013-09-05 Thread Antonio Soares
I need to see all the possibilities. Typing lots of stuff to tell the device to do nothing is not something that makes me happy :) I will consider this closed. Thanks. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt http://www.ccie18473.net -Original Message- From:

[c-nsp] Disabling per-interface mls qos in 12.2SX, Possible? Was: CoPP and WRR

2013-09-05 Thread Antonio Soares
Hello Group, I just found this unanswered question that is related with the WRR issues I have: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-July/052657.html What type of hardware/software supports this ? It is not supported with 12.2.33SXI4a and WS-X6704-10GE/WS-X6724-SFP/WS-X6548-GE-TX. The

Re: [c-nsp] Disabling per-interface mls qos in 12.2SX, Possible? Was: CoPP and WRR

2013-09-05 Thread Phil Mayers
On 05/09/13 16:54, Antonio Soares wrote: Hello Group, I just found this unanswered question that is related with the WRR issues I have: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-July/052657.html What type of hardware/software supports this ? It is not supported with 12.2.33SXI4a and WS-

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast

2013-09-05 Thread John Neiberger
show int counters show ip multicast interface show ip mroute count On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Harry Hambi wrote: > Wanted to see the multicast traffic counters incrementing/or not, on a > specific port > > > Rgds > Harry > > Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb > > -Original Message-

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast

2013-09-05 Thread Harry Hambi
Wanted to see the multicast traffic counters incrementing/or not, on a specific port Rgds Harry Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: 05 September 2013 14:29 To: cisco-nsp@puck.ne

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast

2013-09-05 Thread Phil Mayers
On 05/09/13 14:17, Harry Hambi wrote: Hi all, Is there a command on the 6500 that will show the Multicast traffic in/out of a port?. Thanks in advance What does "show multicast traffic" mean? If you want to see the raw data packets, you'll need to use SPAN or R/ERSPAN. If you want to see I

[c-nsp] Multicast

2013-09-05 Thread Harry Hambi
Hi all, Is there a command on the 6500 that will show the Multicast traffic in/out of a port?. Thanks in advance Rgds Harry Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal v

Re: [c-nsp] MACFLAP loop with l2pt

2013-09-05 Thread Erik Klaassen
Solved by protecting the port with guard loop. Guard loop for the sudden loss of bpdu's on nondesignated ports. Weird this is not mentioned in the l2pt docs, very plausible to happen. Erik - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: "Erik Klaassen" Aan: "Aaron" , cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Verzond