Re: [c-nsp] Best practice, MPLS and MTU settings

2013-10-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, October 25, 2013 04:39:57 AM Nick Hilliard wrote: I aim towards a 9100 byte ip mtu, in order to guarantee a 9000 byte MTU for customers with plenty of overhead on our side. Sometimes this isn't possible due to third party provider core link restrictions. We are a Cisco and

Re: [c-nsp] Meraki...information

2013-10-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 07:52:37 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: If this does turn out to be a bug, I'll be happy to post it to the list or you can contact me directly to request further details. This sounds like quite the issue. Please keep us posted when you hear back from TAC. Mark.

Re: [c-nsp] Best practice, MPLS and MTU settings

2013-10-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, October 25, 2013 10:24:59 PM Aaron wrote: I set all my mpls interfaces to 9216 - ios xr (9k's) 9202 - ios (901's, 3600's) Cisco's highest value is 9,216 bytes, while Juniper generally tops out at 9,192 bytes. We alway match them (which means we never really top out the

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gig CWDM

2013-10-26 Thread Tom Hill
On 23/10/13 17:56, Rolf Hanßen wrote: You should think about using SFP+ + adapter, I think there is a better chance to re-use them after 6500. Agreed. The Cisco OneX work in our WS-6708-3BXL (X2 - SFP+), as well as the FlexOptix converter (their site is down currently, or I'd link you -- but