[c-nsp] Dual Homing

Dear Gurus and Friend, I am seeking a little help on my setup as below:- /---1st Link (C4500)--\ ISP -- CUSTOMER (Fortigate 200B) \---2nd Link (

Re: [c-nsp] qos for broadband aggregation

Hi Mike, In a nutshell: * create qos policies on your aggregation router (7200/ASR). These should be a standard parent/child policy with the parent to shape the traffic and then whatever queueing you want in the child. * add entries in radius to apply qos policy to subscriber virtual-inter

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 with SPA-5X1GE-V2

Yeah, looks like I've been sold the non-V2 ones. I wasn't sure, as the label said "SPA-5X1GE V02" but I've just found some more photos of the same label on a proper V2, and it reads "SPA-5X1GE-V2 V01" Thanks guys. On 14/05/14 01:36, Hagen AMEN wrote: Actually, Chris, looking at your e-mail ag

[c-nsp] qos for broadband aggregation

Hi, Does anyone have code snippets or pointers to implemeting QoS solutions for broadband (eg: dsl) subscribers? The cisco docs are difficult to read and real-world examples would be more helpful here. Thanks. Mike- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisc

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 with SPA-5X1GE-V2

Actually, Chris, looking at your e-mail again, I might be led to think you were sold SPA-5X1GE cards (rather than v2). I don't think the original Ethernet SPAs are supported in the ASR1K platform. Sincerely, Hagen Amen On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Hagen AMEN wrote: > I have several opera

[c-nsp] weird arp cache on 3750

This seemed strange to me. I transitioned management on this 3750 yesterday from vlan 1 to 4000. I simply shutdown vlan 1 and left old IP address on vlan 1 interface. This seems to have caused a problem later on. Yesterday, I was able to manage the 3750 fine over vlan 4000 svi, but last night 3

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 03:00:22 PM Vitkovský Adam wrote: > And that is the "beauty" of me3x00 boxes, there are no > two alike. And they behave differently in the lab and in > production so only several cases can be recreated in the > lab even with the same exact config, IOS code and > topology.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

> On the unit in the field (with the same IOS version, 15.3(3)s) when either > trying to apply the child policy PE-QOS-CPE-OUT (which just uses > percentages) under the PARENT policy (which is suppose to provide the > shape) or by first creating the 11 shapers and childs and then trying to apply >

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

On May 13, 2014, at 7:23 PM, James Bensley wrote: > Thats true, my point is that Cisco aren't allowing oversubscribtion :) That's an interesting sales strategy. ;> - Roland Dobbins // _

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

On 13 May 2014 09:28, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > It no just that 11 x 10 > 100 ? Thats true, my point is that Cisco aren't allowing oversubscribtion :) The plot thickens, I have put the following onto a lab ME3800 and it worked fine. 11x 10Mbps shapers. class-map match-any CUST1-SHAPER match s

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 with SPA-5X1GE-V2

I have several operating in ASR1001s, no apparent issues. westdc-edge1#sh platform Chassis type: ASR1001 Slot TypeState Insert time (ago) - --- - - 0 ASR1001 ok

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 with SPA-5X1GE-V2

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:33:38 AM Chris Balmain wrote: > Has anyone else got SPA-5X1GE-V2 functioning on the > ASR1001 specifically? Anyone seen this issue before? > Have I received bad hardware? I'd also be interested in learning about this, as I've ditched my ASR1001 purchases and won't be

[c-nsp] ASR1001 with SPA-5X1GE-V2

Hey all, We recently acquired a couple of second-hand SPA-5X1GE-V2 to use in an ASR1001, but I'm having some trouble getting them to work. When I insert the card into the router, I get the following message: %SPA_OIR-3-UNSUPPORTED: The SPA-5X1GE (0x44E) in subslot 0/1 is not supported by the I

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

It no just that 11 x 10 > 100 ? Perhaps you could show us the conf? //Mattias On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:10 PM, James Bensley wrote: > Hi All, > > Has anyone encountered this issue on the ME3600/ME3800s; > > Cisco 2960 - Layer 2 device terminating Layer 2 connections > | > | Layer 2 Trunk on 1

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot activate the following os-mbi package because the system is membooted: mem:asr9k-os-mbi-4.2.3

I used these commands, they worked. rommon 1 > TURBOBOOT=on,disk0,format rommon 2 > sync rommon 3 > boot usb:asr9k-mini-px.vm-4.2.3 Thank you very much. -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 2:47 PM To: PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot activate the following os-mbi package because the system is membooted: mem:asr9k-os-mbi-4.2.3

On May 12, 2014, at 10:27 PM, PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX wrote: > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ios(admin)#install activate *4.2.3* synchronous > > > > Error:Cannot activate the following os-mbi package because the system is > > Error:membooted: > > Error:mem:asr9k-os-mbi-4.2.3 > > > > How