On (2014-08-28 15:05 +0100), James Bensley wrote:
Hi James,
> Dare I say it what access/agg layer boxes (such as ME3x00) from Cisco
> will perform QoS deeper than one MPLS label?
ASR9001 certainly. I'm not sure what ME3x00 could in theory do, it does not
seem hard for me to think it could classi
If it supports optical monitoring you can use 'show interface x/y transceiver'
> On 28 Aug 2014, at 19:45, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Are there troubleshooting commands that can be run from the switch CLI to
> check the health of the optics?. I suspect one of the Gbics In my link h
Hi All,
Are there troubleshooting commands that can be run from the switch CLI to check
the health of the optics?. I suspect one of the Gbics In my link has failed.
Rgds
Harry
Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@p
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to get clarification on the max number of EFPs on the me3600/3800s
and am having some difficulty...
The config guide has changed over the various releases adding more info until
we arrive at 15.4 guide like this one.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/metr
On 26 August 2014 10:26, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Personally I think we're missing MPLS option best fit here. Since OptB implies
> you cannot have ACL, QoS or counters per connection. I'd like OptB where you
> could opportunistically create new subinterface, when needed, something like
> this http://p.i
Hi Waris,
We are using rLFA on ASR9k and ME3600.
On ASR9k there are no issues so far.
On ME3600 well you know the story but with the latest fixes we should finally
have BFD error free code.
The rLFA feature is priceless indeed we gained 100% coverage across all our
ring topologies.
The swit
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Nick Hilliard
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:45 PM
> Specifically remote LFA or just LFA? I got hit earlier today with
> CSCui74304: Remote MPLS ping fails in LFA when SVI is one of the core
> interfaces. Are there
