Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and PBR

2014-09-11 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
I am looking to setup some policy based routing on an IOS-XR router. From what I understand, XR does not have PBR, but ABF. When looking at how ABF works, I don¹t see how to set a next hop route (only next hop per TCP port). well, you can direct any traffic matching an ACE (be it layer 3 or

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 and ME3600X licensing

2014-09-11 Thread Duncan Namuhani
You should see something similar with the ME #sh license Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium -Original Message-

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Spyros Kakaroukas
Hello, We've been using /31s wherever we can for quite a while now. Never had any problems with it on cisco ( or any other quality vendor ) routers/switches. The only issue is that, on customer-facing links, there's the occasional customer device that does not support it ( or even worse, lets

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 and ME3600X licensing

2014-09-11 Thread CiscoNSP List
Cheers - Just checked one of the ME's, and am seeing the same: Switch#sh license Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium From:

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and PBR

2014-09-11 Thread Lee Starnes
Hi Oliver, Since we have no default routes and all backbone links are full BGP minus default route, I am going to assume that the second permit statement won't work here. Would this just get specified as any since the first entry would be matched for local netblocks and it would not go further in

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and PBR

2014-09-11 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Since we have no default routes and all backbone links are full BGP minus default route, I am going to assume that the second permit statement won't work here. Would this just get specified as any since the first entry would be matched for local netblocks and sorry, 0.0.0.0/0 should be any..

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Phil Mayers
Likewise. /31 everywhere far end will support it, no issues. -- Sent from my mobile device, please excuse brevity and typos. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 and ME3600X licensing

2014-09-11 Thread James Bensley
On 11 September 2014 07:58, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Cheers - Just checked one of the ME's, and am seeing the same: Switch#sh license Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and PBR

2014-09-11 Thread Lee Starnes
Looks like I may not have this feature as these are 12410XR chassis. Here is what I have in our lab environment. RP/0/9/CPU0:lab-router(config)#ipv4 access-list ABF RP/0/9/CPU0:lab-router(config-ipv4-acl)#permit ipv4 10.10.10.0/24 172.16.0.0/19 RP/0/9/CPU0:lab-router(config-ipv4-acl)#permit ipv4

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 and ME3600X licensing

2014-09-11 Thread CiscoNSP List
Thanks for the help - much appreciated. From: jwbens...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:01:22 +0100 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 and ME3600X licensing On 11 September 2014 07:58, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Cheers - Just checked one of

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR and PBR

2014-09-11 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Looks like I may not have this feature as these are 12410XR chassis. Here is what I have in our lab environment. true, unfortunately ABF is not supported on the XR12000 platform. it works on ASR9k and CRS.. oli ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, CiscoNSP List wrote: Just trying to conserve IPv4 addresses - Has anyone run into any issues with using /31's? (OSPF/BGPanything else?) We use /31s here in many places in a mixed Cisco/Juniper environment, and we have not had any problems with them. jms

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 11/09/2014 08:53, Justin M. Streiner wrote: We use /31s here in many places in a mixed Cisco/Juniper environment, and we have not had any problems with them. fwiw, Brocade doesn't support /31 on its serveriron range, although it works fine on most other boxes which can route packets. It

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Peter Persson
We are running /31s on backbone and /112 on v6 To customer we always use /30 and /112 /Peter 2014-09-11 14:09 GMT+02:00 Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org: On 11/09/2014 08:53, Justin M. Streiner wrote: We use /31s here in many places in a mixed Cisco/Juniper environment, and we have not had any

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
2014-09-11 14:09 GMT+02:00 Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org: On 11/09/2014 08:53, Justin M. Streiner wrote: We use /31s here in many places in a mixed Cisco/Juniper environment, and we have not had any problems with them. fwiw, Brocade doesn't support /31 on its serveriron range, although it

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 11/09/2014 14:00, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Things have changed as /127 are now supported on Brocade NetIron platforms since vers 5.6.0 :-) /31 work just fine. yep, netiron supports /31 just fine, but it's a different code base to the serveriron software. At least as of SI-12.5.01,

Re: [c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

2014-09-11 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
2014-09-11 15:06 GMT+02:00 Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org: On 11/09/2014 14:00, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: Things have changed as /127 are now supported on Brocade NetIron platforms since vers 5.6.0 :-) /31 work just fine. yep, netiron supports /31 just fine, but it's a different code

[c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Drew Weaver
In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it states 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'. I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the slot. Is it under the mounting bracket? Under the faceplate? Is anyone aware of where this

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Scott Granados
Carefully as apposed to what, recklessly press the tab with a hammer? ;) On Sep 11, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote: In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it states 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'. I can't seem

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Mike Hale
You should just be able to pull it out...I don't think there's a tab since it's held in place with the two screws. I don't remember any tabs on the ones I've removed. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net wrote: Carefully as apposed to what, recklessly press the

[c-nsp] Cisco SF302-08 switches

2014-09-11 Thread Murat Kaipov
Hello Guys. Did you have any experience with Cisco Small Business SF300 switches? We purchased few of them and now I have little trouble. I can't add this switches to snmp monitoring. For monitoring purposes I use PRTG v13, I try add snmp mib's published by Cisco on official web site, but they

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Scott Harvanek
Same here, I do not recall any tabs. Scott H. On 9/11/14, 11:16 AM, Mike Hale wrote: You should just be able to pull it out...I don't think there's a tab since it's held in place with the two screws. I don't remember any tabs on the ones I've removed. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Scott

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
On 11 Sep 2014, at 16:12, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote: In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it states 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'. I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the slot. Is it

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 14:12 +, Drew Weaver wrote: I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the slot. Just repeating what others say: There's no tab to be pressed. It must be an error in the documentation. We just loosen the screws and pull the module in the

Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G

2014-09-11 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:57 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: That’s an error in the doc, it should be corrected. There’s no tab. You just unscrew the module and pull it. Heh, it's a detail a senior tech can use to reveal wether a junior tech actually read the documentation. :-) -- Peter

Re: [c-nsp] partition-table and file-system type on Cisco 4500 SUP compact-flash

2014-09-11 Thread Martin T
Another utility, which should support both reading and writing to Class A file-systems, at least to some extent, is cffs: root@T60:~# cffs -v cffs version 0.06 (C) Simon Evans 2002 (s...@secret.org.uk) root@T60:~# However, it seems to refuse to support ATA-type flash-memory cards: root@T60:~#