[c-nsp] OT: NAT64 kills what protocols?

OK I think I know that NAT64 kills TFTP because the ipv4 address is in bedded in the body of the packet. What other protocols will not go through a NAT64 translation? in wireshark, how do I see an IP in the body of the packet? I have a couple other applications that are having issues so I'm

[c-nsp] Share a shaping policy (+ provide committed BW)

Hi Everyone, Scenario is this: Site has five housing units that want to share a 25Mb Internet connection - Simple solution, is to connect them all to something like a 2921, shape the Internet service to 25Mb, and they can all use the 25Mb (FIFO)but, they would like to have a committed 5Mb

Re: [c-nsp] Basic inbound BGP path preferencing query

Hi. You can use as-path prepend to balancing inbound traffic in your directions. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joshua Riesenweber Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:29 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Basic

Re: [c-nsp] Basic inbound BGP path preferencing query

You could always use an as-path prepend, Announce yours routes with the same prefix from both connections route 1 would show as AS123 AS5089 AS-XX route 2 would show as AS123 AS123 AS174 AS-XX This allows more traffic to come in via route 1, whilst still utilising route 2, (you can also add

Re: [c-nsp] Basic inbound BGP path preferencing query

Hi all, Thanks for all the replies, I had a feeling that with a single /24 there would be very little I could do. I had a read through this doco, which described the scenario I'm talking about.http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf5 They

Re: [c-nsp] OT: NAT64 kills what protocols?

I haven't tried it to prove this, or bothered to look (to be honest) but I didn't recall TFTP acting that poorly behanved way like (original/active) FTP does. Regardless, it seems to me like that entire class of problem would be a relatively easy application layer gateway fix ... FWLIW, I know

[c-nsp] NDE Sup720-3BXL and 3CXL with Andrisoft WanGuard

Hi folks, Couple of quick questions.. Can the 65xx with SUP720-3BXL or 3CXL support netflow rates that are not sampled rates ?? At present we are doing a sample rate of 1024, and I'm wondering if we can reduce that to get finer resolution and if that will a) negatively impact the box, b) really

Re: [c-nsp] NDE Sup720-3BXL and 3CXL with Andrisoft WanGuard

On 27/01/15 16:12, John Brown wrote: Hi folks, Couple of quick questions.. Can the 65xx with SUP720-3BXL or 3CXL support netflow rates that are not sampled rates ?? At present we are doing a sample rate of 1024, and I'm wondering if we can reduce that to get finer resolution and if that will