Use igmp-join if you want the router itself to be a member of the multicast
group. You don't need it if you are routing multicast through the router. It's
rarely used and only for very specific circumstances, for example if a servers
fails if there isn't at least one client joining, etc...
Well there are actually two versions of the cmd.
ip igmp static-group
- Is used widely in contribution video setups where there's no PIM/IGMP
between the two providers.
Or in 3play setups to speed up channel selection you statically join all the
channels on the DR for the L2 segment.
Or
Ahh good to know! Thanks again everyone.
Jose
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
It's mostly used for clients that either are ignorant of igmp, or do
it poorly, along with for troubleshooting and a few weird edge cases.
It shouldn't be needed normally.
To the best of my knowledge, there's a completely independent BGP RIB,
where all BGP routes go to live/die. Therefore, RIB failure doesn't
prevent propagation.
Does the RR consider this path its best path for this route? If not, it
won't reflect it. Otherwise, I'd verify that you have
Thanks Peter,
The RR has the route in BGP, albeit with RIB-failure:
#sh ip bgp 0.0.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/0, version 8406453
BGP Bestpath: compare-routerid
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default, RIB-failure(17))
Additional-path-install
Not advertised to any peer
It
Looking to upgrade a couple of our 6500 SUP720-3BXL to 15.1.2SY4a. We have the
WS-6748-GE-TX and WS-6724-SFP Cards installed, no SIP/SPA installed.
Just want to make sure the following associated software is correct. The
software version numbers make you questions yourself because the IOS
It's mostly used for clients that either are ignorant of igmp, or do
it poorly, along with for troubleshooting and a few weird edge cases.
It shouldn't be needed normally.
-Blake
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
Use igmp-join if you want the router itself to be
Hi all
I think this has probably been asked before, but not for a while, so just
wanted to ask the list for an update: Does anyone know when (indeed if!) the
BGP Dynamic Neighbours feature (the 'bgp listen ...' command) will be
integrated into the BGP Peer (Session) Template framework?
