On 2015-05-02 13:08, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Interesting idea,
> CSR1000v BW can go up to 10GE (license base upgrade) right?
Can it handle QoS in any way?
/Anders
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/li
> On 02 May 2015, at 19:52, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
>
> Hello Ranjith,
>
> The IWAN solution is relatively new, so you will not find a lot of people
> with experience with it.
True.
> Also there are interesting operational issues that are probably much harder
> to fix in IWAN world. For example
Hello Ranjith,
The IWAN solution is relatively new, so you will not find a lot of people
with experience with it.
I do not have any practical experience running an IWAN network, but I spent
quite some time looking at the IWAN architecture and design. My opinion is
that on one side the IWAN soluti
On 05/02/2015 09:51 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
10GBASE-ER/EW should only be 40km - ZR would be the longer distance ones.
Can you compare it to the light levels seen on the other end of the
link? The levels should be approximately equal.
Are you sure it is 20 miles and not a little longer? I would
10GBASE-ER/EW should only be 40km - ZR would be the longer distance ones.
Can you compare it to the light levels seen on the other end of the link?
The levels should be approximately equal.
Are you sure it is 20 miles and not a little longer? I would not be happy
running the link based on these li
Hi .
Can anyone please provide inputs on the Cisco iWAN solution .
Thanks,
Ranjith
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Ranjith R wrote:
> Hello Folks ,
>
> We are in the process of evaluating Cisco iWAN solution , would like to
> gather opinions about the solution with the below requirement
>
>
> On May 2, 2015, at 2:35 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> So we are now seeing LDPv6 spring up in IOS XR 5.3.0 - are you going to
> start planning something similar for IPv6 routing/forwarding?
If anything, we’d migrate our entire MPLS core to LDPv6. Don’t hold your
breath though :)
___
Instead of autoconfig, I've always used LDP/IGP synchronization. This prevents
the exact problem you are running into by setting the IGP metric to the max
value if the IGP and LDP aren't in sync (e.g., if you've forgotten to enable
MPLS on an interface). See
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/do
> Mark Tinka
> Sent: 01 May 2015 19:55
> To: Dan Brisson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cheap BGP router for ~20k prefixes
>
>
>
> On 30/Apr/15 16:35, Dan Brisson wrote:
> > Looking for suggestions for a device (switch/router) that can speak
> > BGP and do around 20k prefixes.
