Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920 Family

Hi Waris, Can we assume that BFD dampening will not be supported since it is not listed in the details below? In between. thank you for the shared info. Dimitris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Thursda

Re: [c-nsp] Need working ASR1k pppoe police/shaping

> Hi, > > I am trying to determine a basic configuration for my Asr1k that > will allow me to establish some basic policing / shaping for my PPPoE > subscribers. I have read a lot of the cisco ISG documents and frankly > don't understand any of them; there isn't a clear explanation of the > interre

Re: [c-nsp] Pseudowire VC Types on Cisco

Hi Waris and all, Thanks for your response although this has left me with some confusion. Are you able to clarify for me the following behaviour, based on what you have said? Since VC type 5 is default for EVCs, the following configuration allows me to pass untagged frames over a pseudowire: int

Re: [c-nsp] Need working ASR1k pppoe police/shaping

Lukas, As for rate limiting, when changing from 7200 to ASR, I started needing to use the ISG/SSG way of doing it using the following radius attribute: Cisco-Service-Info = "QU;$inbits;$inburst;$ineburst;D;$outbits;$outburst;$outeburst" Replace variables as appropriate. Pat Thu, Jul 30, 2015

Re: [c-nsp] Need working ASR1k pppoe police/shaping

> Lukas, > > As for rate limiting, when changing from 7200 to ASR, I started needing > to use the ISG/SSG way of doing it using the following radius attribute: > > Cisco-Service-Info = > "QU;$inbits;$inburst;$ineburst;D;$outbits;$outburst;$outeburst" If you can't use predefined policy-maps for wh

[c-nsp] ASA and BGP

I've tried running BGP on the ASA, just few routes, seems to work fine. But now I may need to take in a whole lot more, in a location that only has a pair of ASAs in Asia. I cannot find any documentation about routing limits on the ASA, except for IGP, which states as many as the config(flash)

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASR 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Fragmented Packet Denial of Service Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASR 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Fragmented Packet Denial of Service Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20150730-asr1k Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2015 July 30 16:00 UTC (GMT

[c-nsp] WS-X6704-10GE oper state : not supported

Hi Guys, Someone could tell me if he has already met this issue ? the module is ok , we got traffics, everything is ok but when we run " show power " the module is on not supported state. I think it's a bug. Thanks for your help. -- show power -- system power r

Re: [c-nsp] ASA and BGP

> On 30 Jul 2015, at 15:20, Nick Cutting wrote: > > I've tried running BGP on the ASA, just few routes, seems to work fine. > > But now I may need to take in a whole lot more, in a location that only has a > pair of ASAs in Asia. > > I cannot find any documentation about routing limits on th

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR920 Family

It's not supported on ASR 920 today. Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam ENGINEER.TECHNICAL MARKETING vinba...@cisco.com WebEx Social profile Phone: +1 408 527 2051 Mobile: +1 919 802 8751 CCIE - 25703 www.cisco.com Think before you print.

Re: [c-nsp] How to skip the check RSVP makes for router alert ?

All- Is there a way to make IOS skip the check for RA (router-alert) option in RSVP Path message ? I have a router that's sending such Path messages and IOS is skipping with following error "Received PATH without Router-Alert option - ignoring" Thanks & regards /b _

Re: [c-nsp] How to skip the check RSVP makes for router alert ?

> On 31 Jul 2015, at 4:08, Bala Subrahmanyam Venkata wrote: > > All- > > Is there a way to make IOS skip the check for RA (router-alert) option > in RSVP Path message ? I have a router that's sending such Path > messages and IOS is skipping with following error > > "Received PATH without Router-A