On 13/Aug/15 23:58, Eric Louie wrote:
> We're getting new switches shipped with that code and have been running
> 15.2(4) with great success. However, that old code is 3 years old, and
> management is asking what the latest stable code is.
I don't think my management have ever asked for the la
On 13/Aug/15 16:35, Steve Glendinning wrote:
> In this application how low bandwidth license can you get away with in
> practice? Do the bandwidth license limits apply to both routed
> traffic and control-plane traffic (such as RR BGP updates)?
Well, we wanted to have 8GB of RAM (which was the
Such as:
(config)#mls ip multicast flow-stat-timer 9
Warning: This command is no longer supported.
snmp-server enable traps ethernet cfm alarm
ip nat inside source list 114 pool pool_vrf_DR vrf DR
ip nat inside source static 172.16.76.66 10.10.58.1 vrf MR
https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/de
LDP transport-address is the address of which you tell the neighbor on
that interface to send packets. (such as defaults to the router id,
like a loopback)
If the loopback, or the router id of the router you are on is not
present in the IGP on other routers, you use the transport-address to
t
We're getting new switches shipped with that code and have been running
15.2(4) with great success. However, that old code is 3 years old, and
management is asking what the latest stable code is.
Can anyone vouch for a good stable recent version of IOS for the ME-3600X?
thanks
Eric
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 02:36 Roland Dobbins wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 20:05, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> > That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now.
>
> Yes, that's a perfect application for it.
>
>
Horses for courses :-)
We have found some applications for it as well:
1. Simplific
Hi,
The bandwidth is assessed as a sum on ingress:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/csr1000/software/configuration/csr1000Vswcfg/licensing.html#pgfId-997645
My unscientific experiments seem to indicate that the control plane traffic
is probably not counted towards the licensed bandwid
For completness, this is what we use to get higher performance out of
CSR1000v on ESX:
1. Set Latency Sensitve to High (
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/techpaper/latency-sensitive-perf-vsphere55.pdf
)
2. ethernetX.coalescingScheme = "disable" (for all interfaces on the VM)
3. Pin down memory and
Hi,
Currently we push only a small amount of bandwidth right now - the 2.5G was
during initial testing when we're assessing the performance and
scalability.
At this stage the statistics looks like this:
#show platform software status control-processor
RP0: online, statistics updated 0 seconds ag
At 11:21 13/08/2015 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:37:34AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Cisco really needs to implement a 'show config dead' or similar type
> command that displays all these orphaned policies.
>
> I have a hard enough time with cisco parsing their
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:37:34AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Cisco really needs to implement a 'show config dead' or similar type
> command that displays all these orphaned policies.
>
> I have a hard enough time with cisco parsing their own
> configs though I can't push on this now,
> > Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think.
>
> That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now.
In this application how low bandwidth license can you get away with in
practice? Do the bandwidth license limits apply to both routed
traffic and control-plane traffic (
On 13 Aug 2015, at 20:05, Mark Tinka wrote:
> That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now.
Yes, that's a perfect application for it.
---
Roland Dobbins
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne
On 13/Aug/15 15:44, Jared Mauch wrote:
> You really need to look at 5.3.1 as that fixes a lot of the SSH defects
> that were in 5.1.x. We identified quite a number of defects such as if two
> people
> were logged in at the same time (eg: rancid, someone else) you would not be
> able to l
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've got a pair of new ASR-9904 routers running IOS-XR 5.1.1
> [...]
> >> When a lot of data is being sent at once from the router to my client,
> >> putty will disconnect and give me the error: "Disconn
Cisco really needs to implement a 'show config dead' or similar type
command that displays all these orphaned policies.
I have a hard enough time with cisco parsing their own
configs though I can't push on this now, perhaps someone else can?
- Jared
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 a
On 13/Aug/15 14:32, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> Unsolicited, but well-intentioned, well-informed advice <> naysaying.
Well, the operative word in CSR1000v is Cloud - so my guess is more folk
are (quietly) using them in the data centres to add routing to their VM's.
Mark.
__
On 13/Aug/15 14:07, Nick Cutting wrote:
> There were some discussions on here a few weeks/months back about some best
> practices for running these devices.
I think it was Pshem who shared some tweaks to ESXi to improve performance.
>
> Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I thi
On 13 Aug 2015, at 19:18, Nick Cutting wrote:
> And he received naysayers, rather than real world statistics.
Unsolicited, but well-intentioned, well-informed advice <> naysaying.
---
Roland Dobbins
___
cisco-nsp mailin
And he received naysayers, rather than real world statistics.
I agree, we are both irrelevant here.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Roland
Dobbins
Sent: 13 August 2015 13:16
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSR
On 13 Aug 2015, at 19:07, Nick Cutting wrote:
Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think.
The OP of this thread specifically stated he was using it as an edge
device, however.
---
Roland Dobbins
___
There were some discussions on here a few weeks/months back about some best
practices for running these devices.
Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Roland
Dobbins
Sent: 13
On 13 Aug 2015, at 18:30, Robert Hass wrote:
> Everyone know that it's faster but not everybody needs so huge performance.
Until it gets packeted.
---
Roland Dobbins
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> We use the CSR1000V on ESX as well.
Can you show me how much CPU usage you currently has ?
show processes cpu platform sorted | exclude 0% 0% 0%
show platform software status control-processor
show platform hardware qfp active datapath utilization
sh int | inc rate
What features you'
My goal is max 1G-2G. I can move CSR to 36-cores Xeon server without
problem... I'm looking for real users not discussion than HW/NP is better
than SW.
Everyone know that it's faster but not everybody needs so huge performance.
If I need performance I can order MX5/MX80/MX104 or some ASR.
Rob
O
On 13 Aug 2015, at 15:21, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Although I agree, some Quagga users routing 20Gbps and several full
internet feeds through their boxes would argue.
I doubt this; especially when it's 20gb/sec of 64-byte packets directed
at the router's own interfaces.
---
I lapped it up and the source of the hello messages will be the IP assigned on
the physical address , but when the session comes up , the TCP source from my
side will be the transport-address
BR,
Mohammad
From: eng_m...@hotmail.com
To: jwbens...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE
What
is so weird is that I have configured the mpls ldp discovery
transport-address x.x.x.x and am still seeing the ldp hello messages
from my side sourced from the physical IP address , why?
BR,
Mohammad
Hi Roland,
> Roland Dobbins
> Sent: 12 August 2015 21:35
>
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 1:24, Robert Hass wrote:
>
> > I deployed Cisco CSR 1000V as edge router in DataCenter.
>
> Deploying any variety of software-based router at one's edges is a
> mistake, and has been for many years.
>
Although I agree,
29 matches
Mail list logo
