On 17/Sep/15 15:24, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Today I learned that XR has default maximum-prefix limits -on a contrary to
> regular IOS/XE where there are no default limits.
As a standard IOS XR deployment template, we turn up the wick for this
across the board.
Mark.
Thanks Daniel.
> Please give us a show ip route x.x.x.x and show ip ospf data x.x.x.x so that
> we can analyse the routing.
#sh ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.218
Routing entry for xxx.xxx.xxx.218/32
Known via "ospf 100", distance 110, metric 205, type intra area
Last update from yyy.yyy.yyy.204 o
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CiscoNSP List
Sent: den 18 september 2015 01:58
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Unintentional load balancing of traffic
Hi Everyone,
Have a PE that has 2 "interpop" connections bac
So it took a while, but someone hit on it, and I wanted to emphasize
the point in case some other poor soul runs into this issue.
10Gbase-LRM modules are not supported on Nexus 5000 platforms.
The story I got is that the Nexus 5000s lack the Electronic Dispersion
Compensation (EDC) which is requi
Hi Everyone,
Have a PE that has 2 "interpop" connections back to 2 other PE's...both links
running ospf+mpls.
Link 1 (primary) has ip ospf cost 201
Link 2 (secondary has ip ospf cost 202
But traffic egressing from this PE is load balancing(per session) across the 2
links?
If I do a sh
Hi
I'm just wondering about deployment of 6800IA FEX'es with two 6880-X as
core layer.
Not sure regarding few topics:
1) Do 6800IA have local switching or everything is passing back to 6880-X ?
I mean how communications between two ports is working on same 6800IA unit
if a) two hosts are in same V
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:47:46PM +, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
> i would guess to join our nexus fex's in the pub, the also like to go missing
> in between rancid checkups.
>
> in our case it seems to be a wonky nx-os revision in combination with
> datacenter manager which seems to c
1. I installed a new channelized T3 card on an ASR1004. The router is
already being used as an LNS terminating PPPOE connections, and we just want
to migrate some T1 circuits to the same device.
2. When a T1 interface is brought up, however, I keep seeing the below
error on the log:
Sep 17 13:03
i would guess to join our nexus fex's in the pub, the also like to go missing
in between rancid checkups.
in our case it seems to be a wonky nx-os revision in combination with
datacenter manager which seems to cause quite some load with its checkups.
anything in the router's logs during the dis
Some of these limits are per-platform, so remember there is no “generic ios-xr”.
On the 9K you may need to set your profile to match your use case. It’s less
obvious compared to a generic central CPU platform like most XE devices are.
- Jared
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Adam Vitkovsky
> w
Hi folks,
Today I learned that XR has default maximum-prefix limits -on a contrary to
regular IOS/XE where there are no default limits.
For most of the folks it's really just an early heads up, maybe relevant for
lab tests, but the VPNv4 number is pretty low for big folks or those who are
doing
Hi, all
we monitor all our Cisco gear with Rancid and archive configs in CVS.
(http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/)
One chassis shows a change of config once a day, every day. Five
minutes later at the next rancid run the change is reverted.
1st rancid message:
---
!Interface: FastEthernet
We use it on core-facing links for classes where it makes sense ( ie, not
real-time classes ) . As far as customer services are concerned, we've only had
to manually adjust the queue depth only a couple of times, for some special
cases with special requirements. Since it's so rare, I haven't inc
On 17 September 2015 at 04:29, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> Thanks James - If the queue-limit percent 100 alleviates the issue for the
> one service instance Ive applied it to, I might look at implementing your
> solution, if you have had success with it eliminating tail drops.
I will answer your que
14 matches
Mail list logo
