hey,
Anyone eyeing up the NCS5K range? I could do a lot of damage with a pair of
NCS 5011 and 5001 "linecards". Chassis-free core? Probably not the intended
use case.
Check out this recent Nanog thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/186918?do=post_view_threaded
LSR core -
Anyone eyeing up the NCS5K range? I could do a lot of damage with a pair of
NCS 5011 and 5001 "linecards". Chassis-free core? Probably not the intended
use case.
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
My guess is you will see something from Cisco similar to the PTX1K in the
NCS 55XX series but it will be more expensive than the 500X series. These
boxes I believe use the Broadcom Tomahawk chipset and the NCS55XX uses the
Jericho. The Jericho can support an external TCAM with more routes but
On 25 January 2016 at 11:23, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Interesting I didn't know that, do you know if LU or MQ is responsible for
> the fragmentation? But I'm afraid it would overload the Trio ensemble pretty
> quickly.
> Yeah, on ASR9K the "to be fragmented" traffic
> Saku Ytti
> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 8:05 PM
> To: Alexandre Snarskii
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS and links with limited MTU size
>
> On 24 January 2016 at 16:35, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
> > Not sure if it can be done with Cisco, with
Hello
I just wanted to share with all of you that the new "MPLS in the SDN Era"
book is already shipping. I know well the two authors and the book, and I
can certainly recommend it.
This book's focus is interoperability. Its 900+ pages cover a wide range of
MPLS technologies, illustrated
Hey Saku,
> Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 10:09 AM
> On 25 January 2016 at 11:23, Adam Vitkovsky
> wrote:
>
> > Interesting I didn't know that, do you know if LU or MQ is responsible for
> the fragmentation? But I'm afraid it would