Mine is all green
show facility-alarm status
System Totals Critical: 0 Major: 0 Minor: 0
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adrian
Minta
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 12:30 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp
http://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/8/2/1/96128-ASR%209000%20Multiple%20Services%20onthe%20same%20port%20example.jpg
Look at the Routed VPLS/EoMPLS section
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15-1_2_ey/configuration/guide/3800x3
The last 1001X I bought, I accidently ordered the 1001 - when I changed my
order, I think the price was the same or almost minimal difference. Cisco
doesn't want people buying the old kit either.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of F
Thanks Eric,
We have no visibility into the remote end, but I have setup the following on
one of our ME's (Test service, that has supposedly been configured by carrier,
and remote end)
Vlans are:
940 (outer)
941 (Inner)
Both vlans have been created on the ME, and only vlan 940 on the 4500X th
It does not matter for the 6908 because it is not oversubscribed so you
get 80G regardless.
On 2/1/2016 5:50 AM, Alireza Soltanian wrote:
Thanks in advance
Now what is the case for WS-6908-10G-2TXL ? I searched the Internet but I
could not find any information about Local Switching of this c
Hi Ian,
Based on my understanding, the CPU on 1001-X is more powerful and can handle
more concurrent session establishments. It also has 2 10G interfaces which can
come in handy. However, the queue-count is considerably lower in the 1001s
which makes QoS difficult, depending on your policies. I
Hello Ian,
ASR 1001 is going to be EOS on April :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/eos-eol-notice-c51-734572.html
Replacement : 1001-X
And it's the same price...
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steven Pfister wrote:
> At first, I thought RSPAN. I've never done an RSPAN session, but I got
> it working in a test setup at the central site. I tried the same thing
> with the remote site, but can't get anything but broadcasts.
rspan works by transmitting traffic across vlans which have mac le
I have an application where I need to copy traffic at a remote site and
record it at a central site. At the remote site, all devices are in
their own VLAN and are all connected to a single WS-C2960X-48FPD-L
switch. At the central site, there are several switches I can use for
the recording server (
We have a number of older 7206 routers used in a LNS role (PPP/L2TP).
As part of a network refresh we are looking to move towards the ASR1001 or
1001-X. The datasheet shows both support up to 5Gbps throughput and 8k subs.
Is anyone able to confirm if 8k subs on a ASR1001 realistic in the real
wor
Since is ASR920 bashing time ... anyone else noticed the red led ?
Apparently red is the new green.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http:
Thanks for all the input everyone.
I have spoken with TAC over concerns that the "Software Counters" were
increasing in the output of "show policy-amp control-plane" however it
turns out they should be (this wasn't clear to me from the Cisco docs
so wanted to confirm). Since packets (such as BGP)
For list consistency,
I spoke to TAC and there is no command to see packet hit counters per
queue to see how many packets are matching into each queue (the
equivilent of "show policy-map interface x/x" on a device using HQF).
The best commands I found where:
show mls qos ip Gi2/17
show mls qos q
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:07:46PM +, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> What is is "12.2SX vs. 12.2SR bullshit" all about? I never really
> understood the myriad of letters in the version numbers. I only know
> about the first letter being an S, T, or M.
Please don't full-quote-and-top-post.
Beside
What is is "12.2SX vs. 12.2SR bullshit" all about? I never really understood
the myriad of letters in the version numbers. I only know about the first
letter being an S, T, or M.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tom Marcoen
Technisch consultant
Valid
Wilhelminasingel 107
6221 BH Maastricht
T +31 (0)8
I love EIGRP, albeit in the enterprise. I think I use almost every feature it
has.
But I guess I would not be buying one of these new 5001 high-speedfire-dogs
anyway.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Hilliard
Sent: 02 Febr
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:53:25PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> > And yes, I'm fully aware that using EIGRP has lots of drawbacks, like,
> > "vendor lock in"
>
> you mean "BU lock-in"? Vendor lock-in is old and busted.
Is there a list of Cisco BUs and which product is
> NCS 5001 contains the following ports:
>
> 40 x 10G SFP+ Ports:
> --- 16 x Regular 10G SFP+ Ports
> --- 24 x DWDM & ZR Capable 10G SFP+ Ports
>
> 4 x 100G QSFP28 Ports
>
> Hmmm, I was wondering what the strange colors were over top
> of ports 0-15 (silver) and a different color over top of 16-39
Gert Doering wrote:
> And yes, I'm fully aware that using EIGRP has lots of drawbacks, like,
> "vendor lock in"
you mean "BU lock-in"? Vendor lock-in is old and busted.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/
Robert, yes QSFP28...
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/iosxr/ncs5000/system-setup/60x/b-ncs5000-system-setup-guide-60x/b-system-setup-ncs5500_chapter_01.html
NCS 5001 contains the following ports:
40 x 10G SFP+ Ports:
--- 16 x Regular 10G SFP+ Ports
--- 24 x DWDM & ZR Capable 10G SFP+ Por
Asking right now Lukas... I'll let you know something when I get something
from him
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus [mailto:luky...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 8:47 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in
Hi everybody
I asked a lot of questions about C6500 and you provide the answers to me. I
will be honored if you provide answer to these question regarding NEXUS
switches:
In Nexus 56128P:The data sheet says it Supports 2.56 Tbps of bandwidth
across 48 fixed. If I install two Expansion modules with
Yeah, I just cut a PO for (6) Juniper ACX5048 boxes
I gotta have options... I can't just be cisco only.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 8:31 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: 'Gert Doering' ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
Sorry about off topic, regarding the complaints about Cisco listed below,
Please let me know whether or not Juniper is better about ensuring features
work in their new products... and also, is Juniper better in handling things
like this when you bring it their attention ? how do y'all like JTAC
On 2 February 2016 at 15:09, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Are you running 5+ by any chance?
>
>> It’s been years since IOS-XR was released on ASR9000's, no excuse now for
>> basic features still not working. The TAC responses aren’t helpful either;
>
> I'm sorry to hear that as I have very positive exp
On 2 February 2016 at 14:22, Aaron wrote:
> XR 6.0.0 ? I'm just getting to know this box a little... lldp freezes
> console and/or telnet when enabled globally
Sounds like when the ASR920 first come out. We got some demo units,
the loopback interface would go down and only a reboot would fix it.
> James Bensley
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:16 PM
>
> On 2 February 2016 at 12:47, Mikael Abrahamsson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, James Bensley wrote:
> >
> >> IOS-XR is much needed but jesus christ its been buggy as hell for us
> >> on the 9000 series routers.
> >
> >
> > Stable, ch
--- Begin Message ---
On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Aaron wrote:
>
> wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names
> that start with "H" !!
>
> RP/0/RP0/CPU0:eng-lab-5001-1#sh ip int br
> Mon Feb 1 15:37:16.489 CST
Been looking at these for a while and the price po
There isn't EIGRP but there _IS_ RIP? Really? I thought this was 2016.
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Services
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.neth
> James, I just got info from my account SE that the NCS-5001/2 on Release XR
> 6.0.0 does not have RSVP-TE support.
Did the SE imply that this will come (roadmap) or that it won't be supported
on this platform?
thx
James, I just got info from my account SE that the NCS-5001/2 on Release XR
6.0.0 does not have RSVP-TE support. I asked him previously about something
else that isn't supported at the moment (MPLS L3VPN) and he said it's coming
at the end of the month. So we will see how that goes.
Aaron
-
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:22:58AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> I don't see eigrp.
Thanks for checking - saw this in the product announcement, couldn't
believe it. Especially as this is just control-plane stuff which is
already in XR 4+XR 5, so it was consciously taken *out*... (or "we didn't
think
Our Nexus 3048 has a debug partition with two files that change hourly
causing Rancid to send a diff email. Any way to disable the logs?
Here are the two files:
Nexus3k.100.13.1# dir debug:
254712Feb 02 13:34:17 2016 bootvar_debug.log
6Feb 02 13:34:17 2016 bootvar_de
XR 6.0.0 ? I'm just getting to know this box a little... lldp freezes
console and/or telnet when enabled globally, SE says it's not in BASE
release yet... mpls l3vpn isn't in base release either... so I don't want
to judge XR 6.0.0 yet since as I understand it, I'm dealing a few new
things... at
Yup.
Their SW quality and has gone completely down the shitter (don't even get me
started on their 'Applications' i.e.: Prime). They are spreading themselves
too thin, trying to do too much, getting BUs to compete with one another, and
we're all stuck paying the price. Their only innovation i
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, James Bensley wrote:
My mind is pretty set on this, their testing has been appalling (I’m
obviously moaning at Cisco about this) – I’d like to know what others
think.
Back in the late 00:s XR for the CRS was rock solid (as long as you
managed to get the thing up and runni
On 2 February 2016 at 12:47, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, James Bensley wrote:
>
>> IOS-XR is much needed but jesus christ its been buggy as hell for us on
>> the 9000 series routers.
>
>
> Stable, cheap, fast. Pick any two.
>
> I am not aware of any product the past 10-15 years
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, James Bensley wrote:
IOS-XR is much needed but jesus christ its been buggy as hell for us on
the 9000 series routers.
Stable, cheap, fast. Pick any two.
I am not aware of any product the past 10-15 years that didn't have
serious bugs at first customer shipment. If you wan
You are probably better using a service instance for each vlan. Then you can
send each VLAN where ever.
service instance 800 ethernet
description description LINK_TO_CARRIER_X_VIA_4500X
encapsulation dot1q 800 second-dot1q 10
rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric
bridge-domain 10
service i
On 2 February 2016 at 01:46, Aaron wrote:
> Y'all are a hoot...
>
> My Cisco SE just told me that the base release of this NCS-5001 that I have
> doesn't support L3VPN until the end of this month. I'll move on to testing
> L2VPN til then...
>
> Thanks gents
>
> Aaron
Classic Cisco, they've re
Thanks for the quick reply - We use service instances quite a bit, but only
popping first tag, then creating vlan int (for vrf), or PWso fairly basic
stuff :)
In this circumstance, where we would receive vlan 800 as outer tag, and we want
to access inner vlans 10,20,30 how would this look
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/design/guide/ME3600x_Design_Guide.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/design/guide/CE2-0_certification_v1.pdf
http://d2zmdbbm9feqrf.cloudfront.net/2012/usa/pdf/BRKSPG-2209
Hi Everyone,
We have an AGG port(Standard trunk port) to a carrier on a 4500X - Port has
multiple customer vlans for p-t-p eth services.
A service they have released will allow us to connect to azure/office 365 via
QinQ(Carrier doing QinQ, not us) - i.e. We agree to an outer vlan tag with the
Hello,
is anybody using Cisco CSV 1K as an Internet router with partial of full route
? We have a contingency and would like to set up quickly a VM for a single eBGP
peering with no more than 500M.
Best Regards
Andrea
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisc
Hello Aaron.
That sounds nice could you give any feedback when you have done some more tests
with it?
We are looking at it as a replacement for our 6.5k P boxes. The spec sheet says
that it would be a good fit but it would be interesting to get your opinion on
them. :)
//Gustav
-Origina
Hi
what is difference between topmost exp and exp on mplsqos ?
when i want change exp on P1 to P2 (from 5 to 3 ) ,i should use what
command ?
R3(config-pmap-c)#set mpls experimental ?
<0-7> Experimental value
imposition Set Experimental value at tag imposition
topmost Set Exper
46 matches
Mail list logo
