Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Upgrade

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:10:58PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > admin install add tftp://x.x.x.x/asr9k-mini-px.pie-5.3.2 synchronous > > if you can, you should use ftp instead of tftp for XR upgrades. It's > much faster. I asked Cisco to remove TFTP support

Re: [c-nsp] NAT problem on ISR 4331

I often use setups like this - I image the cloud based filtering service needs different IP addresses to differentiate? Is your below config using the single public address in the internet VRF table for internet access? Why not use another address (or two different ones) for the NAT to the

[c-nsp] NAT problem on ISR 4331

Hello guys, I have an ISR 4331 that i'm using for guest and hotspot traffic. For each network (guest and hotspot) I have created a VRF so I have a proper separation between them. Also, I have another VRF for the internet interface. Like this, I'm sure nobody is going to mess-up access lists. The

[c-nsp] enf_broker log message - asr9000

IOS XR 4.1.2 ASR9010 Is this a problem ? RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14 09:32:18.958 : enf_broker[199]: Could not enqueue disconnect fd 1073741857 for 35046 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14 09:32:37.619 : enf_broker[199]: Could not enqueue disconnect fd 1073741856 for 35046 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Mar 14

[c-nsp] N7K VPC

Hi All I have a weird setup , I have N7K with F2 module and another N7K with F2e module Will the VPC between those be functional? Thanks BR, Mohammad ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASA 5520 shaper > 150Mbps

2016-03-14 13:09, Nick Cutting написав: Even on 9.1 - same limit: mpf-policy-map-class mode commands/options: <64000-15440> Target Bit Rate (bits per second), the value needs to be multiple of 8000 This command is not supported on the X models at all. Thanks Nick! I know that

Re: [c-nsp] ASA 5520 shaper > 150Mbps

Even on 9.1 - same limit: mpf-policy-map-class mode commands/options: <64000-15440> Target Bit Rate (bits per second), the value needs to be multiple of 8000 This command is not supported on the X models at all. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - MPLS L3VPN Issue

On 9 March 2016 at 20:27, Tom Hill wrote: > Presumably to "prove" this (or rather, to add any evidence at all) it's > wipe & reinstall time for the affected 9001? > > I'm not trying to get your back up here - I'm more concerned about FUD > vs. actual, operational experience.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Upgrade

On 13 March 2016 at 07:34, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Dears > I am trying to upgrade my ASR9K router from 4.3.2 to 5.3.2 Why 5.3.2 and not 5.3.3? 5.3.2 is an early deployment and 5.3.3 is the extended maintenance release? > The issue am facing is the space , am running out

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Upgrade

Thanks all BR, Mohammad > From: rob.st...@kpn.com > To: n...@foobar.org; eng_m...@hotmail.com > CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASR9K Upgrade > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:40:43 + > > It's also possible to re-partitioning the disk to get some extra space(300M). >

[c-nsp] ASA 5520 shaper > 150Mbps

Hi, All! ASA 5550 with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.2(5)59 Trying to shape outgoing traffic on ~290Mbps (upstream provides 300Mbps). But ASA allows only: ASA1(config-pmap-c)# shape average ? mpf-policy-map-class mode commands/options: <64000-15440> Target

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K Upgrade

It's also possible to re-partitioning the disk to get some extra space(300M). Executing the re-partitioning is not service impacting. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCub41271 https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/145991/managing-disk-space-rsp-4grsp-8g-aka-rsp2 Regards, Rob