Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K VSM

2016-03-29 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, I was after subscribers, not sessions (as in 'active NAT translations'). Your current port_limit (of 2048) is higher than what you can get out of ratio of private/public IPs (around 75:1). You can only get around 900 TCP + 900 UDP ports on average per active subscriber in your setup. From the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K VSM

2016-03-29 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Dear Pshem I think I got confused :) I have around 4M or 4000K active sessions not 300K if I got you right And then 400/4096=976 Am I right ? BR, From: pshe...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:32:25 + Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K VSM To: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net L

Re: [c-nsp] ISSU on nexus 5k with vPC/lacp

2016-03-29 Thread Lukas Tribus
> Hi, > > Today we upgraded a couple of N7Ks in one of our DCs. > > Everytime we ask cisco about ISSU the answer is "it's supported, it works, > but why can't you perform a traditional upgrade?" A (gif) picture is worth a thousand words: https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2014/06/17/the-vendor

Re: [c-nsp] ISSU on nexus 5k with vPC/lacp

2016-03-29 Thread George Giannousopoulos
Hi, Today we upgraded a couple of N7Ks in one of our DCs. Everytime we ask cisco about ISSU the answer is "it's supported, it works, but why can't you perform a traditional upgrade?" Also after some bad experiences with ISSU in the past, we decided to just reload the boxes. All servers are dual