Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote: > There's a feature request open for this. The whole "use link-local next-hops for peers where the session is via a global address" is one of the most stupid ideas in this whole IPv6 thing anyway. There is no benefit, but a

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Sebastian Ganschow
Hi, Cisco ist interpretting the RFC a little strange... You need to disable the connected check on that neighnor to make it work. Neighbor 1.2.3.4 *disable-connected-check* As ling as it's enabled, they are preferring the link-local and the route-map doesn't apply. There's a feature request o

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Josef Verich
Hi Marco. Some time ago I had to solve similar problem. I used this workaround: ! router bgp 64512 neighbor 2001:DB8::1 ebgp-multihop 2 ! It is ugly but ... Can you try it? Best regards, Pepa ___ cisco-nsp mailing list ci

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Job Snijders
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:44:14PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:55:25PM +0200, Marco Marzetti wrote: > > Do you have any ideas? > > ipv6 route 100::1/128 null0 Some testing showed that the above doesn't change the situation. As discussed on IRC, there are is thi

Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Job Snijders
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:55:25PM +0200, Marco Marzetti wrote: > Do you have any ideas? Have you tried the same setup but with the following more-specific discard route instead of the /64? ipv6 route 100::1/128 null0 You also may want to set: interface null0 no ipv6 u

[c-nsp] IPV6 RTBH on IOS

2016-05-02 Thread Marco Marzetti
Hello, I am working on RTBH for IPv6 on IOS and i am stuck with the odd behavior of the OS. Let's say that i have the following configuration on the router: ! hostname R2 ipv6 unicast-routing ! interface Gi1/0 ipv6 address 2001::DB8::2/64 ! router bgp 64512 bgp maxas-limit 30 neighbor 2001

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

2016-05-02 Thread Aaron
There are some changes in the config with 5.3.3. Try this as a basic setting control-plane management-plane out-of-band interface MgmtEth0/RSP0/CPU0/0 allow SSH allow SNMP allow NETCONF ! interface MgmtEth0/RSP1/CPU0/0 allow SSH allow SNMP allow NETCONF ! !

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

2016-05-02 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 2 May 2016, chip wrote: Anyone have any example code or pointers to docs that spell this out or at least point to how to determine the request to make. Bonus if its python or perl. I've made several tools using NETCONF with the Juniper kit but am having trouble with Cisco. What ver

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

2016-05-02 Thread chip
Running 5.3.3 in the lab. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 2 May 2016, chip wrote: > > Anyone have any example code or pointers to docs that spell this out or >> at least point to how to determine the request to make. Bonus if its python >> or perl. I've mad

[c-nsp] IOS XR and Netconf Operational Data

2016-05-02 Thread chip
Hi all, I'm having a difficult time locating resources to aid in getting operational data out of ASR9ks via NETCONF. I can find several examples of just wrapping cli commands and output in simple XML, but that seems no better than just logging in via ssh and screen scraping as normal. I'd real

Re: [c-nsp] QinQ layer 3 port channel

2016-05-02 Thread Wes Smith
Standard ether channel between the A client and A core/pe switch. But just a single link at the B end. L3 connection between A and B clients over qinq. I know end-end ether channel works. It's this mismatch that is confusing me. Sent from my iPhone > On May 2, 2016, at 12:09 AM, Garrett