Hi,I want config BCP (Bridge Control Protocol ) .
For this target i used it link :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/bridging/configuration/guide/15-s/br-15-s-book/br_bcp.pdf
If we want to ping from one VLAN to another ,do we need set gw on router ?
if no ,how packet send from a vlan10 and
Slightly larger frames and a bit more config. In terms of throughput its line
speed or near enough to not distinguishwe're doing it on 10Gb links.
Be aware though that any WAN carriers that might be doing tagged MPLS stuff
have to support the protocol our initial circuit was such and M
I believe the overhead is 40 bytes or less for L2 MTU.
I don't have support matrix information. I basically referred to a breakout
session from Cisco Live and the following link and took it from there:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750x_3560x/software/release/15-0
MacSec looks interesting - what kind of overhead does it add?
Would it generally work through a L2 MPLS circuit MTU wise?
Also - is the a feature support matrix anywhere for this ?
From: Darin Herteen [mailto:syn...@live.com]
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Nick Cutting; cisco-nsp@puck.net
On 6 May 2016 at 19:17, Rick Martin wrote:
Hey,
> We are deploying Catalyst 3650;s with ASA's at the customer sites, using
> Nexus 9504's for our aggregation sites. All hardware was spec'd by Cisco,
> this was a very big deal and they brought in MANY Cisco internal resources to
> come up with
I'm currently testing MACSec using Cisco 3560-CX in the lab in a
Switch-to-Switch manual deployment and so far so good. If you don't want to get
elaborate the price point might be attractive..
Darin
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Nick Cutting
Sent: Frid
On 6 May 2016 at 20:13, Nick Cutting wrote:
> What other technologies/products could I consider at either end, that are
> available in the enterprise space?
MACSEC seems to be increasingly available.
--
++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-ns
What do you mean by "the response was slow"? Do you mean that he's not
getting the full 1Gb speed? I don't think many content providers will
actually offer full Gig throughput for downloads. Do you experience
packet loss, high latencies?
On 5/6/2016 12:17 PM, Rick Martin wrote:
I realize tha
You need to factor in the latency for throughput especially if you are using
one flow to measure throughput - (1 gig only possibly with 0 latency) - read
this guide from Brad Hedlund:
http://bradhedlund.com/2008/12/19/how-to-calculate-tcp-throughput-for-long-distance-links/
-Original Messa
Link encryption and scalability kit etc
We have many clients connecting back to our DC using mostly 3rd party L2
circuits.
There has been an increasing number of requests to encrypt these links - as
they want to protect against the "possibly many" service providers that are in
the transit path.
You're missing the fundamentals here is the problem.
I suggest reading about how buffers, bandwidth delay product, tcp send
and receive windows, and QoS work.
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Rick Martin wrote:
>
>
> I realize that this is not specifically a Cisco question but I have googled
>
I realize that this is not specifically a Cisco question but I have googled and
have not come up with an answer, I know of no better pool of knowledge than
this group so here goes.
We have a statewide network and we are significantly upgrading bandwidth to
customer sites, all connections on
This is the screenshot of invoice. See attachment. I think it has price for
smartNet, but not included in $30k
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 6, 2016, at 7:39 AM, CiscoNSP List wrote:
>
>
> As Mark (And I) have saidit depends.if it comes with RP2/ESP40/SIP40s
> etc, then its ok.
As Mark (And I) have saidit depends.if it comes with RP2/ESP40/SIP40s
etc, then its okif its just a chassis, then US$30K is wy expensive
lol...you should only pay $2-3K for chassis only
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Satish Patel
Sen
On 6/May/16 13:34, Satish Patel wrote:
> Do you think it's costly ?
Yep, but I'd like to see what you have in there. That would be telling.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ns
Do you think it's costly ?
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 6, 2016, at 2:40 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 5/May/16 20:41, Satish Patel wrote:
>>
>> Need your input or suggestion, I have check with one of company and
>> they sales *used Cisco equipments so i have asked for ASR1004 and its
On 6/May/16 13:03, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> If it comes with ESP40, RP2, SIP40s + some SPA's...you'd be getting up around
> the $30K I would think?
Details would definitely help.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puc
If it comes with ESP40, RP2, SIP40s + some SPA's...you'd be getting up around
the $30K I would think?
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka
Sent: Friday, 6 May 2016 4:40 PM
To: Satish Patel; Cisco Network Service Providers
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR10
18 matches
Mail list logo
