[c-nsp] NG-MVPN support on 7600/SUP|RSP720

2016-05-16 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Hi, I have a bunch of 9Ks in a mVPN Profile 4 configuration. Works a treat. I’m trying to see if there’s a way that I can extend that mVPN topology to a MPLS enabled 7600/SUP|RSP720-3BXL. CCO and CFN seem to suggest that there’s support for mVPN (maybe not necessarily Profile 4, although CFN

[c-nsp] EVC/BDI vs dot1q subint on ASR1K

2016-05-16 Thread CiscoNSP List
Hi Everyone, Historically, we have used the old-style dot1q subints on 7200's, and then when we moved to the ASR1K, BDI had a bug with FNF, so we went with dot1q subints, purely for netflow support.BDI/FNF Ive yet to test on our new batch of ASR1001X's, but do "most" use EVC/BDI vs dot1q s

[c-nsp] unsubscribe

2016-05-16 Thread Wes Smith
unsubscribe Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

2016-05-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On 16/May/16 22:09, Satish Patel wrote: > Guys! > > Question does ASR9010 has different ESP module or it does support > ASR1006 (ASR1000-ESP40) I'd spend some time on the data sheets for these platforms, Satish. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisc

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

2016-05-16 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:09:57PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote: > Question does ASR9010 has different ESP module or it does support > ASR1006 (ASR1000-ESP40) Except for the letters "ASR", there is nothing whatsoever in common between ASR1000 and ASR9000 family - different hardware, different f

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

2016-05-16 Thread Satish Patel
Guys! Question does ASR9010 has different ESP module or it does support ASR1006 (ASR1000-ESP40) On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:13 AM, James Bensley wrote: > On 14 May 2016 at 22:11, Tom Hill wrote: >> And as requested, here's the hottest running 9001 I have - stuffed in a >> tiny Quarter cabinet.

Re: [c-nsp] "show rpl unused" bug?

2016-05-16 Thread brad dreisbach
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:20:13PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: We have encountered a bug on an ASR9010 running IOS-XR v5.1.3 where "show rpl unused" results in a few hits like these: The following as-path-sets are UNUSED -- aspath_191_p1_permit The f

[c-nsp] "show rpl unused" bug?

2016-05-16 Thread Hank Nussbacher
We have encountered a bug on an ASR9010 running IOS-XR v5.1.3 where "show rpl unused" results in a few hits like these: The following as-path-sets are UNUSED -- aspath_191_p1_permit The following community-sets are UNUSED ---

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR 1002-X PPPoE Subscriber QoS policies

2016-05-16 Thread Brian Turnbow
Hi, > > Hi folks, > > I have to setup a QoS policy to maximise the limited bandwidth on the cross > connects to our broadband backhaul provider. > > To date I have used per session policies but I am not sure that this will account > for the scenario where all subscriber sessions request more b

Re: [c-nsp] BGP flowspec S/RTBH for large DDoS

2016-05-16 Thread Saku Ytti
On 16 May 2016 at 12:29, Nathan Ward wrote: > I see what you’re getting at, and the behaviour to prevent attacks I suspect > that you’re thinking of is the default. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5575#section-6 > > Roughly, you only use flowspec routes from external networks if they are the

Re: [c-nsp] BGP flowspec S/RTBH for large DDoS

2016-05-16 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 16/05/2016, at 21:00, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:43:59AM +0700, Roland Dobbins wrote: >> I personally don't know of any operator allowing customers to use >> flowspec on PE devices. > > Not having the hardware to do flowspec across our network yet, I haven

Re: [c-nsp] BGP flowspec S/RTBH for large DDoS

2016-05-16 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:43:59AM +0700, Roland Dobbins wrote: > I personally don't know of any operator allowing customers to use > flowspec on PE devices. Not having the hardware to do flowspec across our network yet, I haven't investigated this closely. But I do wonder what sort of filt

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

2016-05-16 Thread James Bensley
On 14 May 2016 at 22:11, Tom Hill wrote: > And as requested, here's the hottest running 9001 I have - stuffed in a > tiny Quarter cabinet. Output grepped for inlet temps: > > Sat May 14 20:57:10.061 UTC > hostInlet0 36.5 > hostInlet1 33.1 >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

2016-05-16 Thread James Bensley
On 14 May 2016 at 20:48, Tom Hill wrote: > On 14/05/16 20:30, James Ventre wrote: >> I've been down this road with other boxes (3750E/2811/6500), it's just >> too much of a headache. >> >> Depending on the rack and it's elevation in the rack, they often sit >> right on the threshold. The system t

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR 1002-X PPPoE Subscriber QoS policies

2016-05-16 Thread James Bensley
I think what you are looking for is this: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/service-exchange/sce-virtual-service-control-engine/index.html You want to be able to change the subscriber shaping policies live on the active sessions ("on-the-fly"). You could roll-your-own and use RADIUS CoA but