Re: [c-nsp] ASA for IPv6

Pretty much as youve said.  Asa works fantasticly well with v6 ... including ospfv3 and v6 tunnelling for.anyconnect.   Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: Michael Lee Date: 20/08/2016 10:56 p.m. (GMT+00:00) To:

Re: [c-nsp] ACL performance question

I don't think ASR1k has LOU concept. In EARL platforms LOU is HW optimisation to handle port-ranges without burning huge amount of TCAM, OPs example showed no port ranges being used which would mean no LOUs being used. To answer OP's question, yes, it is cheaper in ASR1k (and all HW

[c-nsp] ASA for IPv6

Hi, Currently I have ASA 5580 with IPv4 NAT setup (public IP outside and RFC 1918 inside), I am considering to run IPv6 with Public IPv6 outside and Public IPv6 inside (routing mode) Just wondering there is anything I would need to consider except CPU, memory and sessions) Thanks, ~mike

Re: [c-nsp] ACL performance question

--- Begin Message --- - Original Message - From: Satish Patel To: Cisco Network Service Providers Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 1:23 PM Subject: [c-nsp] ACL performance question We have ASR1006 Router and we are running ACL on it to

[c-nsp] ACL performance question

We have ASR1006 Router and we are running ACL on it to allow specific port to specific server. Question is there any ACL performance impact on individual IP vs full subnet. like following example. we have 202.100.100.0/24 subnet now i want to use first 200 IPs for web server port 80 remaining 55