Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

At 02:02 PM 9/9/2016 Friday, Nick Hilliard asserted: Tim Stevenson wrote: > which is 8 x 1G > connections to 8 x 8:1 oversubscribed port ASICs. the easiest way to think of a 6148 is that it's like 8 individual 1G ethernet hubs connected into a 1G switch. Now, now - a hub would flood

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Tim Stevenson wrote: > which is 8 x 1G > connections to 8 x 8:1 oversubscribed port ASICs. the easiest way to think of a 6148 is that it's like 8 individual 1G ethernet hubs connected into a 1G switch. Once you visualise it in these terms, you can immediately see that performance is going to be

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Hi Nick, please see inline below: At 12:32 PM 9/9/2016 Friday, Nick Cutting asserted: Good afternoon Lords of the Layers, Anyone remember far back enough to answer two questions on the SUP2 supervisor on an original (NON-E) 6513 chassis? It seems the online cisco documentation doesn't go

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:23:47PM +, Nick Cutting wrote: > Thank you for the replies > Seems even a single 3560v1 is better than this supervisor. Yes. The Sup2 is something like 15 years old, and just not up to GigE stuff. (On the plus side, it's extremely robust and reliable - which

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Thank you for the replies Seems even a single 3560v1 is better than this supervisor. -Original Message- From: Nick Cutting Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 4:00 PM To: Nick Cutting ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:00:07PM +, Nick Cutting wrote: > Specifically - this message: > > Adding a WS-X6148-GE-TX port to a channel limits the channel's bandwidth to a > maximum of 1Gig throughput. > > Per flow? Or in total The 6148-GE-TX is (and has always been) a piece of shit.

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Specifically - this message: Adding a WS-X6148-GE-TX port to a channel limits the channel's bandwidth to a maximum of 1Gig throughput. Per flow? Or in total -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Friday, September

[c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

Good afternoon Lords of the Layers, Anyone remember far back enough to answer two questions on the SUP2 supervisor on an original (NON-E) 6513 chassis? It seems the online cisco documentation doesn't go further back than the SUP 32 - it's very hard to find a datasheet for this. Mod Slot Ports