Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

On 2016-09-19 22:48, Peter Rathlev wrote: Just to be crystal clear: Sup2T hardware and software fully supports using same VLAN ID on different interfaces, and you can mix it with a SVI for good measure. Nick Cutting posted a configuration snippet that shows what can be done. Ok missed that,

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 11:39 +0200, Anders Löwinger wrote: > Sup2t has support in HW for using same VLAN-id on different L3  > interfaces. Cisco has no SW to support it :( Just to be crystal clear: Sup2T hardware and software fully supports using same VLAN ID on different interfaces, and you can

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

It's a switch! -pavel On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Anders Löwinger wrote: > On 2016-09-19 10:19, Gert Doering wrote: > >> Things like that makes one wonder if Sup2T is intentionally trying to >> kill the platform... "too late, too limited, too stupid design decisions" >>

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

On 2016-09-19 10:19, Gert Doering wrote: Things like that makes one wonder if Sup2T is intentionally trying to kill the platform... "too late, too limited, too stupid design decisions" (like, the new netflow implementation "with MAC addresses"). Sup2t has support in HW for using same VLAN-id

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:52:33AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote: > I haven't played with it, but the implementation on Sup2T seems quite > limited. As a start you need to globally enable provider-bridge dot1ad > mode, which is incompatible with using LACP. Things like that makes one wonder if

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

Good morning, > Am 19.09.2016 um 09:52 schrieb Peter Rathlev : > > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:24 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: >>> On 16 Sep 2016, at 17:32, Nick Cutting wrote: >>> Depends on supervisor - With sup 2t - you could reuse vlans on >>> subinterfaces, here is 2

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:24 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > > On 16 Sep 2016, at 17:32, Nick Cutting wrote: > > Depends on supervisor - With sup 2t - you could reuse vlans on > > subinterfaces, here is 2 subinterfaces on different ports, and an > > SVI all on vlan 281 > > > > ! > > interface

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading a C3750x-24T-S only works up to 15.2(1)E3

Hi Bjoern Am 15.09.16 um 12:32 schrieb bjo...@verfriemelt.com: > We have a stack of 2 C3750x-24T-S Switches and want to upgrade the IOS > to support C3KX-NM-10G. I have successfully upgraded the member to > 15.2(4)E2 but i have no success with the master. We had the very same issue with a