Re: [c-nsp] Strange Routing..

Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 07:15:14PM -0500, Howard Leadmon wrote: > #sho ip route 206.126.237.0 > > Routing entry for 206.126.237.0/32, 1 known subnets > > Attached (1 connections) > > L206.126.237.136 is directly connected, Vlan99 This is funny. What does "show running | inc

Re: [c-nsp] Strange Routing..

OK, this is even crazier, and now I may never find it. After updating and restarting the router this issue happened, but I found out I forgot one of the prefix lists to a peer, so thought OK, let’s be safe and just reload the BGP configs I had stored to be safe. After doing that reload,

Re: [c-nsp] Strange Routing..

What does a 'show ip cef detail' return for those? On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Howard Leadmon wrote: > OK, and in my terrible lack of sleep maybe I am missing something that I > shouldn't be, but here is the issue.. > > > > I have a 7606 with RSP720's running IOS

[c-nsp] Strange Routing..

OK, and in my terrible lack of sleep maybe I am missing something that I shouldn't be, but here is the issue.. I have a 7606 with RSP720's running IOS 15.3(3)S6 at this time. Across the Ashburn exchange they use the IP block of 206.126.236.0/22 for peering. If I look at the router and ask

Re: [c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

I'm no expert in EEPROMs but recall awhile back we had an optical vendor (transport-side, not router-side) that did do frequent writes (maybe it was for performance info) to EEPROM and burned them out that way after a couple of years. Maybe your vendor is saying they don't support reporting this

Re: [c-nsp] [c-nsp ]Router with legacy interfaces

> If you need something that is still currently supported by Cisco, the 3900 > ISR could also be an option. Currently supported yes, but the EOL announcement is already out:

Re: [c-nsp] [c-nsp ]Router with legacy interfaces

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, ?~\?~C?~@???~B ?~Z?? wrote: I need router with many types of legacy intergaces including STM-1, Channelized E1, Async (optionaly). Also I need switch module with 16 - 24 GE-T port and up to 8 SFP ports. Any suggestions? As others have mentioned, a 7206VXR with an

Re: [c-nsp] [c-nsp ]Router with legacy interfaces

On 22/Nov/16 10:31, Мурат Каипов wrote: > Hello guys! > I need router with many types of legacy intergaces including STM-1, > Channelized E1, Async (optionaly). Also I need switch module with 16 - 24 > GE-T port and up to 8 SFP ports. Any suggestions? Cisco ASR1000 or Juniper MX104. Mark.

Re: [c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Tim Durack wrote: > I have a vendor that does not support SFP DOM SNMP polling. They state this > is due to EEPROM read life cycle. Constant reads will damage the SFP. Complete and total garbage. Reading from EEPROM and Flash both DO NOT WEAR.

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Logging

Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:19:06AM -0500, Samir Abid Al-mahdi via cisco-nsp wrote: > Dear Experts, > > ANY HELP ??? INSERT COIN gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich,

Re: [c-nsp] NAT Logging

--- Begin Message --- Dear Experts, ANY HELP ??? Thanks in advance. BR Best Regards On 18 November 2016 at 18:00, Samir Abid Al-mahdi < samir.abid...@gorannet.net> wrote: > Dears Experts, > > I have been reading about NAT CGN and the NAT logging method in which you > can pre-define a port

Re: [c-nsp] [c-nsp ]Router with legacy interfaces

Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:31:53AM +0300, ?? wrote: > I need router with many types of legacy intergaces including STM-1, > Channelized E1, Async (optionaly). Also I need switch module with 16 - 24 > GE-T port and up to 8 SFP ports. Any suggestions? 7200/NPE-G1 or

Re: [c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

> Would be easy for cisco to implement some ram compression > technique in the sup720 code which would be nice but I suppose > it's not a priority. "Not a priority" is quite an understatement. This platform is nearly dead, ain't nobody gonna start implementing software workarounds to extend the

Re: [c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Tim Durack wrote: > > I have a vendor that does not support SFP DOM SNMP polling. They state this > is due to EEPROM read life cycle. Constant reads will damage the SFP. > > We SNMP poll SFP DOM from Cisco equipment without issue. > > Not

Re: [c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

It applies regardless of soft reconfig. Soft reconfig doesn't even use that much ram compared to the actual bgp table. Would be easy for cisco to implement some ram compression technique in the sup720 code which would be nice but I suppose it's not a priority. On 11/17/2016 9:12 AM,

[c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

I have a vendor that does not support SFP DOM SNMP polling. They state this is due to EEPROM read life cycle. Constant reads will damage the SFP. We SNMP poll SFP DOM from Cisco equipment without issue. Not heard this one before. Trying to see if there is some validity to the statement.

[c-nsp] [c-nsp ]Router with legacy interfaces

Hello guys! I need router with many types of legacy intergaces including STM-1, Channelized E1, Async (optionaly). Also I need switch module with 16 - 24 GE-T port and up to 8 SFP ports. Any suggestions? Thank you! -- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

On 16 November 2016 at 08:33, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > Updated Document with fixed formatting and also moved it to google drive > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5Q6qCRMe89_ZThNbWdDUWpyR2c?usp=sharing Thanks for updating the document Waris. Can you clarify what

Re: [c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

Which is exactly what we are doing, as the RSP720's are pretty much dirt cheap in the used market today. I have some SUP720's running on the SXJ release, and it's at 95% memory usage with several full feeds of IPv4/IPv6. Jumping to the RSP720 with 4G RAM, I figure will hold us till we actually