I am also using a 7606, running multiple full BGP tables from transit
connections, plus a bunch of IX peering sessions to boot. Of course you
have to have the XL DFC's, and as many have said it has a limited lifespan,
but outside of that with the current cost of the hardware it's still a decent
I'm not sure of the exact differences - but think the 44x1's put the policy
into asics, wheres the 43x1's are much more of a software router - which is why
there is a huge price difference.
This could explain the differences between them.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco
Hi,
it's the first time I test a Cisco ME1200 and got some basic questions.
(Till now we used ME3400 Switches to deploy QinQ L2 VPNs.)
I got two ME1200-4S-A Switches and wonder how to get into iCLI? I am able
to access the "NID Configuration" on console and to access the web
interface (after I co
Am 25.11.2016 um 13:39 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
>> It seems that the 4331 is not able to police or shape on sub-interface
>> level anymore.
>
> Its works fine on my 4431 (not 4331) box. I have a subinterface level
> shaper with child policies.
>
> Can you guys elaborate what doesn't work?
> Does IOS
> It seems that the 4331 is not able to police or shape on sub-interface
> level anymore.
Its works fine on my 4431 (not 4331) box. I have a subinterface level
shaper with child policies.
Can you guys elaborate what doesn't work?
Does IOS reject the configuration?
Does it fail to match/queue traf
Am 24.11.2016 um 11:19 schrieb Mohammad Khalil:
> it might work if the service-policy applied directly under
> the physical interface?
We got our first 4331 some days ago and I can confirm, that QoS with ACL
matching on the pysical interface is working, even in the case when this
interface is part
