Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME1200 iCLI

On 29/Nov/16 08:00, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > We have hundreds of them deployed, and growing. We operate them via CLI, I meant to say we operate them via the GUI. The GUI is fully-featured. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME1200 iCLI

On 28/Nov/16 20:04, Erik Sundberg wrote: > I have a couple of these sitting on the shelf too. Configuration guides > didn't match how to configure the NID's. Don't know why Cisco thought it was > a good idea to make the ME1200 completely different from the rest of the > ME3400,3600,3800

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

On 29 November 2016 at 02:10, Nick Hilliard wrote: > the tiny buffers on this chipset will ensure that latency will be > excellent. Packet loss going from fast to slow interface? Probably not > so good if there are any microbursts. Quite, and that will only matter in Internet

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

Saku Ytti wrote: > For internet latency, TridentII may be problematic, if you need to go > from fast interface to slow interface. the tiny buffers on this chipset will ensure that latency will be excellent. Packet loss going from fast to slow interface? Probably not so good if there are any

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

On 28 November 2016 at 20:21, Gert Doering wrote: > Have you evaluated it as a "limited table" IPv4/IPv6 router (like, a few > 1000 internal routes, no full BGP stuff)? I find it tempting... For internet latency, TridentII may be problematic, if you need to go from fast

[c-nsp] Netflow on non-IP interfaces?

Hi list, I'm trying, perhaps in vain, to get some Netflow data on a non-IP interface on an ASR1K - in this case, a PPPoE server interface like: interface Port-channel1.20 encapsulation dot1Q 20 pppoe enable group ! I tried defining a custom record that only matches & collects very basic

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME1200 iCLI

Hi Guys We have also been working with a demo pair of those, intended as CPE for some E-Line like services. From my side, I have never seen that weird CLI everyone is talking about, I just started with the console and had a very IOS-like CLI. I got the devices from the demo pool, so maybe

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

Hi, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:54:25PM +, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Now with the NCS5000 I'am wondering now how it competes with the ASR920. It > > has 1/10G and four 100G ports, thats some difference, but beyond that, > > mainly feature-wise (IOX vs XE) what can I expect from both? > > The

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME1200 iCLI

I have a couple of these sitting on the shelf too. Configuration guides didn't match how to configure the NID's. Don't know why Cisco thought it was a good idea to make the ME1200 completely different from the rest of the ME3400,3600,3800 lines.This device does not run IOS. So we are looking at

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

> Now with the NCS5000 I'am wondering now how it competes with the ASR920. It > has 1/10G and four 100G ports, thats some difference, but beyond that, > mainly feature-wise (IOX vs XE) what can I expect from both? The NCS500x is a dumb, dumb switch. Its a cheap and fast-tracked Trident II+

[c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

Hi list, I need a replacement for our ME3600Xs and I know that ASR920 is the next generation of the ME3600. Now with the NCS5000 I'am wondering now how it competes with the ASR920. It has 1/10G and four 100G ports, thats some difference, but beyond that, mainly feature-wise (IOX vs XE) what can